Case Digest (G.R. No. 225899) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Republic of the Philippines v. Jennifer B. Cagandahan (G.R. No. 166676, September 12, 2008), the respondent, originally registered as Jennifer Cagandahan, was born on January 13, 1981 in Pakil, Laguna and recorded as female in her Certificate of Live Birth. On December 11, 2003 she filed before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 33 of Siniloan, Laguna, a Petition for Correction of Entries in Birth Certificate, praying that her name be changed from “Jennifer” to “Jeff” and her gender from “female” to “male.” The petition recounted that respondent was diagnosed with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH), a rare intersex condition in which excessive male hormones impede normal female development, resulting in ambiguous genitalia, lack of menstruation, and pronounced male secondary sex characteristics by adolescence. To support her claim, respondent presented the medical testimony of Dr. Michael Sionzon of the UP-PGH Department of Psychiatry, who confirmed her XX chromosomes b Case Digest (G.R. No. 225899) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Petition and allegations
- On December 11, 2003, Jennifer B. Cagandahan filed a Petition for Correction of Entries in her birth certificate before the RTC of Siniloan, Laguna, alleging she was born January 13, 1981 and registered as female.
- She claimed a diagnosis of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH), resulting in both male and female characteristics, with clitoral hypertrophy, underdeveloped ovaries and lack of breast and menstrual development by age 13, and asserted she identifies and functions as male.
- Procedural steps and evidence
- The petition was published for three successive weeks and served upon the Solicitor General’s office; the Local Civil Registrar was furnished copies but not impleaded.
- Respondent presented medical testimony and a certificate from Dr. Michael Sionzon (UP–PGH Psychiatry) confirming permanent CAH, excess androgen production, ambiguous genitalia, absence of menstruation, and recommending gender change.
- RTC decision
- In its January 12, 2005 Decision, the RTC granted the petition, ordering the birth certificate amended: name changed from “Jennifer” to “Jeff” and gender from “female” to “male.”
- The RTC further directed correction of school records, voter registry, baptismal certificate, and other pertinent documents to conform with the amended entries.
Issues:
- Compliance with procedural rules
- Whether the petition complied with the residency requirement under Rule 103, Sec. 2(b).
- Whether the petition improperly failed to implead the Local Civil Registrar as an indispensable party under Rule 108, Sec. 3.
- Scope of Rule 108 and effect of CAH
- Whether correction under Rule 108 may include change of “sex” or “gender” in a birth certificate.
- Whether respondent’s medical condition (CAH) legally qualifies her as “male” for purposes of civil registry entry.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)