Title
People vs. Marra y Zarate
Case
G.R. No. 108494
Decision Date
Sep 20, 1994
Nelson Tandoc was fatally shot in 1992; Samuel Marra was convicted based on eyewitness testimony, his admission, and evidence. The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction, rejecting self-defense claims and nighttime aggravation.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 108494)

Facts:

  • Case Commencement and Trial Proceedings
    • On March 7, 1992, Nelson Tandoc was fatally shot. An information for murder was filed in RTC Branch 43, Dagupan City, against Samuel Marra y Zarate and other John and Peter/Paul/Tom Doe defendants. On June 4, 1992, Allan Tan alias “Allan Yao” was substituted for John Doe.
    • Warrant of arrest against Tan returned unserved; trial proceeded solely against Marra. Arraigned May 15, 1992, Marra pleaded not guilty. On October 8, 1992, the RTC found him guilty of murder with the aggravating circumstance of nighttime and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua, plus civil indemnities (P50,000 death indemnity; P50,000 actual damages; P100,000 moral damages; costs).
  • Eyewitness Account (Jimmy Din)
    • At about 2:00 A.M., Din and Tandoc were conversing in front of Lucky Hotel when a man on the opposite sidewalk made obscene gestures, then retreated to a corner where Din and Tandoc confronted him. Two companions arrived; a fight ensued and the three men fled.
    • Din and Tandoc hid inside the hotel annex. After 10–15 minutes, they exited; as Tandoc opened the sliding door, Din saw Marra—then in a security guard’s polo—shoot Tandoc at close range under a bright 20-watt fluorescent bulb. Tandoc was shot in the chest and later died at Villaflor Hospital.
  • Police Investigation and Appellant’s Statements
    • At 3:45 A.M., SPO 3 de Vera and colleagues investigated the scene, then went to Villaflor Hospital where Din described the shooter’s uniform. They traced Marra eating at a nearby eatery, confirmed he was on duty as a guard, and secured his revolver from his home (five live rounds and one spent shell).
    • De Vera confronted Marra; initially Marra denied involvement, then admitted shooting Tandoc once in self-defense, alleging the victim had a samurai sword. No such weapon was found. Marra was detained; Din positively identified him at the station. Marra had no firearm license.
  • Medical and Financial Evidence
    • Dr. Tomas Cornel’s autopsy: gunshot wound entering left anterior chest and exiting lower right shoulder.
    • Prosecutor Gregorio Gaerlan testified to funeral and related expenses totaling over P45,000 (funeral services, hospital bills, interment fees, wake expenses, etc.).
  • Appellant’s Defense Version
    • Marra testified he was on duty at Linda’s Ihaw-Ihaw from 7:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. He claimed he went home around 4:00 A.M. to change, then ate with a cashier, and was later accosted by police who took his sidearm.
    • He denied firing the weapon (five live rounds only), denied knowing Din or cause for hostility, and insisted on self-defense when confronted with the shooting accusation.

Issues:

  • Whether the positive identification by eyewitness Jimmy Din was sufficiently credible.
  • Whether Marra’s admission to SPO 3 de Vera was inadmissible under the constitutional safeguard against custodial interrogation.
  • Whether nighttime constituted an aggravating circumstance and whether treachery qualified the murder.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.