Title
Penaranda vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 214426
Decision Date
Dec 2, 2021
Petitioner attacked victim with weapons in retaliation for a fare dispute; SC ruled no intent to kill, convicting him of serious physical injuries instead of attempted murder.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 214426)

Facts:

  • Charging and Initial Proceedings
    • On March 9, 2006, Rolen PeAaranda (petitioner) and four others were charged with frustrated murder for assaulting Reynaldo Gutierrez y Suacoco (Gutierrez) in Meycauayan, Bulacan on June 5, 2005.
    • The Information alleged that the accused, armed with a samurai and lead pipe, conspired and attacked Gutierrez with intent to kill him. Acts of treachery and abuse of superior strength were also alleged.
    • Petitioner pleaded not guilty at arraignment; trial on the merits ensued.
  • Versions at Trial
    • Prosecution’s Version (Gutierrez)
      • Gutierrez, a tricycle driver, had filed a complaint against petitioner for excessive fare.
      • On June 5, 2005, between 7:30 to 8:00 PM, Ivan Villaranda summoned petitioner and others to the tricycle terminal.
      • Petitioner threw a stone hitting Gutierrez’s left arm. Gutierrez initially held a steel pipe but lowered his defense after Raul intervened.
      • Edwin Celedonia alighted a tricycle and hacked Gutierrez with a samurai on his upper right biceps. Other assailants joined in hitting Gutierrez with steel pipes and stones.
      • The assailants then fled, with Rannie throwing a steel pipe hitting Gutierrez’s stomach during escape.
      • Gutierrez sought immediate medical help, resulting in issuance of medico-legal documents and photographs of injuries.
  • Defense’s Version (Petitioner)
    • Before June 5, Gutierrez had filed a complaint against petitioner for overpricing but petitioner denied the charge.
    • Gutierrez cursed, threw a stone, and chased petitioner with a “panaksak” but a barangay official intervened.
    • Petitioner claimed no actual confrontation occurred afterwards despite awareness that Gutierrez was following him.
    • He denied throwing stones during the incident and denied being “Raul Kalbo,” an assailant named by Gutierrez.
  • Decisions of Lower Courts
    • Regional Trial Court (RTC) Decision (May 14, 2012)
      • Found petitioner guilty beyond reasonable doubt of attempted murder.
      • Rationale included: use of deadly weapons (samurai, steel pipe), petitioner’s prior threats, treachery based on victim’s lowered guard after Raul’s intervention, and abuse of superior strength.
      • Absence of evident premeditation.
      • Sentence: Indeterminate imprisonment of 4 years & 2 months (minimum) to 10 years (maximum); awarded P10,000 each as temperate, exemplary, and moral damages.
  • Court of Appeals (CA) Decision (September 26, 2014)
    • Affirmed RTC decision with modification:
      • Sentence reduced to 2 years 4 months (minimum) to 8 years (maximum).
      • Damages awarded: P10,000 temperate, P10,000 exemplary, P20,000 moral, all with 6% interest.
    • Found abuse of superior strength but ruled out treachery since Gutierrez was armed at the time of attack.
    • Conspiracy was established based on coordinated attack and deception to disarm the victim.
    • Accepted Gutierrez’s credibility and rejected petitioner’s alibi as unsubstantiated.

Issues:

  • Whether petitioner is guilty of the crime of attempted murder.
  • Whether the attendant circumstances of treachery, abuse of superior strength, and conspiracy are present.
  • What is the appropriate penalty and damages.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.