Title
Moday vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 107916
Decision Date
Feb 20, 1997
Municipality of Bunawan expropriated private land for public use despite Sangguniang Panlalawigan disapproval; Supreme Court upheld expropriation’s validity, citing public purpose and authority under local government code.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 107916)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background of Expropriation
    • On July 23, 1989, the Sangguniang Bayan of Bunawan, Agusan del Sur passed Municipal Resolution No. 43-89 authorizing the mayor to initiate expropriation of a one-hectare portion of Lot No. 6138-Pls-4 (TCT No. T-3132) owned by Percival Moday for a farmers’ center and sports facilities.
    • Mayor Anuncio C. Bustillo approved Resolution No. 43-89 and transmitted it to the Sangguniang Panlalawigan for review.
  • Disapproval, Condemnation Proceedings, and Appeals
    • On September 11, 1989, the Sangguniang Panlalawigan disapproved the resolution as unnecessary, citing other available lots in Bunawan.
    • The Municipality of Bunawan filed a Petition for Eminent Domain in RTC Prosperidad, later amending the complaint to include petitioners’ parents as defendants.
    • On March 6, 1991, the municipality deposited P632.39 with the municipal treasurer and moved for possession; the RTC granted the motion on July 2, 1991.
    • Petitioners’ motion for reconsideration was denied on October 31, 1991. Their certiorari petition to the Court of Appeals (CA G.R. SP No. 26712) was dismissed on July 15, 1992, and reconsideration denied on October 22, 1992.
  • Subsequent Developments and Supreme Court Intervention
    • Respondent municipality erected three buildings (ABC Hall, motorpool, and gymnasium) on the subject land.
    • Petitioners filed a petition for review with the Supreme Court on November 23, 1992.
    • The Supreme Court issued a TRO on December 8, 1993, restraining further occupation and construction; on March 15, 1995, it cited former Mayor Bustillo for contempt and ordered demolition of blocktiendas.
    • A new mayor moved in June 1996 to dissolve the TRO.

Issues:

  • Whether a municipality may validly expropriate private property by virtue of a municipal resolution disapproved by the Sangguniang Panlalawigan.
  • Whether the disapproval of Resolution No. 43-89 on grounds of “unnecessary expropriation” was within the Sangguniang Panlalawigan’s authority.
  • Whether allegations of political oppression and availability of alternative municipal lands invalidate the expropriation and give rise to personal liability of the former mayor.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.