Case Digest (G.R. No. 107916) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Percival Moday, Zotico Moday (deceased), and Leonora Moday v. Municipality of Bunawan, the petitioners owned a one-hectare portion of Lot No. 6138-Pls-4 along the national highway in Bunawan, Agusan del Sur, covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-3132 in the name of Zotico Moday and assessed at ₱632.39 per hectare. On July 23, 1989, the Sangguniang Bayan of Bunawan adopted Municipal Resolution No. 43-89 authorizing the mayor to initiate expropriation of that parcel for a farmers’ center and sports facilities. The mayor approved and forwarded the resolution to the Sangguniang Panlalawigan, which on September 11, 1989, disapproved it as unnecessary, noting other municipal lots were available. Undeterred, the municipality filed an eminent domain petition before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Prosperidad, amended to join petitioners’ parents as co-defendants, and deposited ₱632.39 as provisional compensation. On March 6, 1991, the RTC granted the municipality’s motion ... Case Digest (G.R. No. 107916) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Background of Expropriation
- On July 23, 1989, the Sangguniang Bayan of Bunawan, Agusan del Sur passed Municipal Resolution No. 43-89 authorizing the mayor to initiate expropriation of a one-hectare portion of Lot No. 6138-Pls-4 (TCT No. T-3132) owned by Percival Moday for a farmers’ center and sports facilities.
- Mayor Anuncio C. Bustillo approved Resolution No. 43-89 and transmitted it to the Sangguniang Panlalawigan for review.
- Disapproval, Condemnation Proceedings, and Appeals
- On September 11, 1989, the Sangguniang Panlalawigan disapproved the resolution as unnecessary, citing other available lots in Bunawan.
- The Municipality of Bunawan filed a Petition for Eminent Domain in RTC Prosperidad, later amending the complaint to include petitioners’ parents as defendants.
- On March 6, 1991, the municipality deposited P632.39 with the municipal treasurer and moved for possession; the RTC granted the motion on July 2, 1991.
- Petitioners’ motion for reconsideration was denied on October 31, 1991. Their certiorari petition to the Court of Appeals (CA G.R. SP No. 26712) was dismissed on July 15, 1992, and reconsideration denied on October 22, 1992.
- Subsequent Developments and Supreme Court Intervention
- Respondent municipality erected three buildings (ABC Hall, motorpool, and gymnasium) on the subject land.
- Petitioners filed a petition for review with the Supreme Court on November 23, 1992.
- The Supreme Court issued a TRO on December 8, 1993, restraining further occupation and construction; on March 15, 1995, it cited former Mayor Bustillo for contempt and ordered demolition of blocktiendas.
- A new mayor moved in June 1996 to dissolve the TRO.
Issues:
- Whether a municipality may validly expropriate private property by virtue of a municipal resolution disapproved by the Sangguniang Panlalawigan.
- Whether the disapproval of Resolution No. 43-89 on grounds of “unnecessary expropriation” was within the Sangguniang Panlalawigan’s authority.
- Whether allegations of political oppression and availability of alternative municipal lands invalidate the expropriation and give rise to personal liability of the former mayor.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)