Title
Matibag vs. Benipayo
Case
G.R. No. 149036
Decision Date
Apr 2, 2002
Petitioner challenged ad interim COMELEC appointments, her reassignment, and disbursements; SC upheld appointments' validity, reassignment authority, and lawful disbursements.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 149036)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Petitioner’s Positions and Appointments
    • February 2, 1999 – Ma. J. Angelina G. Matibag is appointed Acting Director IV of the Education and Information Department (EID) of COMELEC.
    • February 15, 2000 & February 15, 2001 – Her temporary appointment as Director IV, EID, is renewed by Chairperson Demetriou and Commissioner Javier.
  • COMELEC Vacancies and Ad Interim Appointments
    • March 22, 2001 – President Arroyo ad interim appoints Alfredo L. Benipayo as Chairman and Resurreccion Z. Borra & Florentino A. Tuason, Jr. as Commissioners, terms expiring February 2, 2008; Commission on Appointments takes no action.
    • June 1 & June 8, 2001 – President reissues ad interim appointments; appointees retake oaths; Congress adjourns without confirming.
  • Reassignment and Administrative Protests
    • April 11, 2001 – Chairman Benipayo issues memorandum designating Velma J. Cinco Officer-in-Charge of EID and reassigning Matibag to the Law Department.
    • April 16–23, 2001 – Matibag requests reconsideration; is denied; appeals to the en banc; files administrative/criminal complaint against Benipayo for improper transfer during the election period.
  • Petition Before the Supreme Court
    • August 3, 2001 – Matibag files a Rule 65 petition challenging (a) constitutionality of the ad interim appointments, (b) her removal and reassignment, (c) Cinco’s OIC designation, and (d) salary disbursements by the Finance Services OIC.
    • September 6, 2001 – President again renews the ad interim appointments; Matibag’s petition is opposed by respondents.

Issues:

  • Judicial Review Prerequisites
    • Does Matibag have standing, and are there an actual controversy, earliest opportunity, and lis mota to invoke this Court’s constitutional review?
  • Nature of Ad Interim Appointments
    • Do ad interim appointments to COMELEC constitute prohibited “temporary or acting” appointments under Article IX-C, Section 1(2)?
  • Renewal and Reappointment Prohibition
    • Do successive renewals of the ad interim appointments breach the constitutional ban on reappointment for COMELEC members?
  • Authority to Reassign Matibag
    • Did Chairman Benipayo exceed his authority by reassigning Matibag without en banc approval or due process, and violate Section 261(h) of the Omnibus Election Code?
  • Legality of Disbursements
    • Did Finance Services OIC Gideon C. De Guzman act in excess of jurisdiction by paying salaries and emoluments to Benipayo, Borra, Tuason, and Cinco?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.