Title
Maralit vs. Philippine National Bank
Case
G.R. No. 163788
Decision Date
Aug 24, 2009
The Supreme Court denies retirement benefits to a former bank employee for policy violations and loss of trust.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 163788)

Facts:

  • Ester B. Maralit was employed by the Philippine National Bank (PNB) from August 27, 1968, to December 31, 1998.
  • She progressed from a casual clerk to a branch manager during her tenure.
  • In February 1998, PNB introduced the Special Separation Incentive Plan (SSIP), approved by Board Resolution No. 1.
  • SSIP guidelines allowed employees with pending administrative cases to apply, but benefits would be paid only after case resolution.
  • On September 8, 1998, PNB's Internal Audit Group reported Maralit for violating bank policies, involving unfunded checks totaling P54,950,000.
  • Maralit applied for early retirement on September 15, 1998, after being charged with serious misconduct on September 29, 1998.
  • She was placed under preventive suspension on October 16, 1998.
  • PNB conditionally approved her retirement on November 20, 1998, pending the outcome of her administrative case.
  • On February 14, 2000, she was found guilty of serious misconduct and dismissed, forfeiting her retirement benefits.
  • Maralit filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) for non-payment of retirement benefits and damages.
  • The Labor Arbiter ruled in her favor, awarding benefits and damages, but the NLRC modified the decision, deleting damages.
  • PNB appealed to the Court of Appeals, which set aside the NLRC's resolution, leading to the current petition.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court denied Maralit’s petition and affirmed the Court of Appeals' decision, which set aside the NLRC's resolution.
  • The Court held that the NLRC did not commit grave abuse of discretion and that...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court reasoned that the NLRC's review power does not exclude the possibility of grave abuse of discretion.
  • The NLRC acted within its authority, and the Labor Arbiter'...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.