Case Digest (G.R. No. 178835)
Facts:
- Magis Young Achievers' Learning Center and Mrs. Violeta T. Cariao are the petitioners.
- Adelaida P. Manalo was hired as a teacher and acting principal on April 18, 2002, with a monthly salary of P15,000.
- Manalo submitted her resignation on March 29, 2003, effective April 1, 2003, citing personal and family reasons.
- On March 31, 2003, the petitioners terminated her employment, citing a board resolution to abolish the principal position for cost-cutting.
- Manalo filed a complaint for illegal dismissal and non-payment of her 13th month pay on April 4, 2003, seeking reinstatement, back wages, and damages.
- The Labor Arbiter dismissed her illegal dismissal complaint but ordered payment of her 13th month pay.
- The NLRC reversed the Labor Arbiter's decision, ordering reinstatement and back wages.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the NLRC's decision, prompting the petitioners to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court ruled that Manalo's resignation was not effective due to the employer's lack of acceptance and the circumstances of her resignation.
- The Court determined that Manalo was not a permanent employee, as she had not completed the required three-year probationary period...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court emphasized that resignation must be a voluntary act; in this case, Manalo's resignation was not entirely voluntary, as she filed a complaint for illegal dismissal shortly after.
- The Court noted that probationary employees have security of tenure during their probation,...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 178835)
Facts:
The case involves Magis Young Achievers' Learning Center and Mrs. Violeta T. Cariao as petitioners against Adelaida P. Manalo as the respondent. On April 18, 2002, Adelaida P. Manalo was hired as a teacher and acting principal at Magis Young Achievers' Learning Center, with a monthly salary of P15,000. On March 29, 2003, Manalo submitted a letter of resignation to Cariao, stating her intention to resign effective April 1, 2003, due to personal and family reasons. However, on March 31, 2003, she received a letter from the petitioners terminating her employment, citing a board resolution to abolish the position of Principal as part of a cost-cutting scheme. Following this, on April 4, 2003, Manalo filed a complaint for illegal dismissal and non-payment of her 13th month pay, seeking reinstatement, back wages, and damages. In her position paper, she argued that her termination violated her employment contract and that the abolition of her position was not a valid ground for dismissal under the Labor Code. The petitioners contended that Manalo was legally terminated after her one-year probationary period, as she had not met the criteria for permanent employment. The Labor Arbiter dismissed her complaint for illegal dismissal but ordered the payment of her 13th month pay. On appeal, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reversed this decision, ordering her reinstat...