Title
Jacutin vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 140604
Decision Date
Mar 6, 2002
A high-ranking city health officer was convicted of sexual harassment for demanding sexual favors from a job applicant, affirmed by the Supreme Court with modified damages.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 140604)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Charge
    • Petitioner Dr. Rico S. Jacutin, City Health Officer of Cagayan de Oro City, was charged by Information dated 22 July 1996 before the Sandiganbayan, Fourth Division, with Sexual Harassment under R.A. No. 7877.
    • The alleged victim was Ms. Juliet Q. Yee, a 22-year-old fresh Nursing graduate seeking employment in the City Health Office.
  • Circumstances of the Alleged Offense
    • November 28–29, 1995: Ms. Yee, accompanied by her father (a boyhood friend of petitioner), made initial inquiries for employment; petitioner mentioned possible openings in a Family Planning research project and a visiting U.S. medical group.
    • December 1, 1995 (morning): Ms. Yee and her father returned; petitioner interviewed her alone after her father left, inquired into her virginity, suggested hypothetical sexual touching, and scheduled a “research” physical examination after lunch.
    • December 1, 1995 (afternoon): Unable to find hospital openings, petitioner reaffirmed the research offer, summoned Ms. Yee to a bowling outing, and instructed her to wait on Borja Street. In his car, he asked her to expose her legs for a varicose-vein check, pulled her pants down, inserted his hand into her panty, later fondled her abdomen and breast, and demanded silence in exchange for ₱300.
    • Aftermath: Ms. Yee returned home, partially reported to her mother, attempted to return the money on December 4, 1995, suffered emotional disturbance, underwent counseling for post-traumatic stress, and attempted self-harm.
  • Defense and Lower Court Proceedings
    • Petitioner denied the allegations, claiming no vacancy existed, and asserted an alibi for the afternoon of December 1, supported by purported Committee on Awards meeting minutes and a plane ticket.
    • He alleged the complaint was part of political harassment.
    • On November 5, 1999, the Sandiganbayan convicted him of Sexual Harassment, sentencing him to six months’ imprisonment, a ₱20,000 fine, moral damages of ₱300,000, and exemplary damages of ₱200,000.
  • Appeal to the Supreme Court
    • Petitioner argued (I) R.A. No. 7877 did not apply to him, and (II) the evidence was insufficient, violating due process and the presumption of innocence.
    • The Supreme Court set the case for resolution of these contentions.

Issues:

  • Applicability of R.A. No. 7877 to public officers like Dr. Jacutin and to the facts of this case.
  • Sufficiency of the prosecution’s evidence and compliance with petitioner’s due process rights.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.