Title
House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal vs. Panga-Vega
Case
G.R. No. 228236
Decision Date
Jan 27, 2021
HRET denied Atty. Panga-Vega’s early return post-hysterectomy; CSC ruled in her favor, upheld by CA and SC, affirming suppletory maternity leave rules under RA 9710.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 228236)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Leave Application and Approval
    • On February 2, 2011, Atty. Daisy B. Panga-Vega, then Secretary of the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET), requested a special leave of up to two months under Republic Act No. 9710 (Magna Carta of Women) to undergo a total hysterectomy.
    • On February 3, 2011, HRET approved her request, granting special leave not to exceed two months starting February 7, 2011.
    • On February 7, 2011, Panga-Vega underwent the surgery.
  • Return to Work and HRET Directives
    • On March 7, 2011, after one month of leave, Panga-Vega informed HRET she was resuming duties and submitted a medical certificate (dated March 5) stating “no contraindication to resume light to moderate activities.”
    • On March 9, 2011, she provided a second certificate attesting she was “fit to work.”
    • On March 10, 2011, HRET directed her to consume the full two-month leave to ensure prolonged rest and to avoid stress due to a pending investigation into alleged tampering of minutes.
  • Administrative Reconsideration and Appeals
    • On March 14 and 24, 2011, Panga-Vega sought and was denied reconsideration by HRET, which cited her need for rest and confusion over her medical condition.
    • On April 13, 2011, she appealed to the Civil Service Commission (CSC) assailing HRET’s March 10 and 24 resolutions.
    • On October 9, 2012, the CSC granted her appeal, set aside HRET’s directive, and ordered payment of back salaries and benefits from March 7 to April 7, 2011, applying suppletory maternity leave rules.
    • On November 23, 2012 and February 12, 2013, HRET’s motions for reconsideration were denied by the CSC.
  • Judicial Proceedings
    • On March 19, 2013, HRET filed a petition for review with the Court of Appeals (CA).
    • On April 29, 2016, the CA dismissed the petition, affirming the CSC’s findings on leave benefits and suppletory application of maternity rules.
    • On November 8, 2016, the CA denied reconsideration.
    • On January 27, 2021, HRET filed this Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 before the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Did HRET have the legal capacity to file the petition without express OSG deputation?
  • Can the rules on maternity leave under EO No. 292 be suppletorily applied to the special leave benefit under RA 9710?
  • Did Panga-Vega comply with the CSC Guidelines to return to work without exhausting her full two-month leave?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.