Title
Herminio A. Besmonte vs. National Police Commission-National Capital Region
Case
G.R. No. 260148
Decision Date
Apr 3, 2024
Police officer Herminio Besmonte used excessive force during a buy-bust operation, leading to charges of grave misconduct. The Supreme Court reclassified the offense to simple misconduct, imposing a six-month suspension instead of dismissal.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 260148)

Facts:

  • Buy-Bust Operation and Arrest
    • On April 11, 2003 at around 10:30 p.m., PO2 Herminio A. Besmonte (poseur-buyer), PO2 Gil Anos, and PO2 Junnifer Tuldanes conducted a buy-bust at Factor Compound, Almanza Uno, Las Piñas City, based on a confidential informant tip that Evangeline Abenojar was illegally peddling shabu.
    • According to the police team, Abenojar sold PHP 100 marked money worth of suspected shabu, resisted arrest, kicked and cursed, and was subdued after reasonable force was used.
  • Allegations of Abuse
    • Abenojar claimed that at around 9:30 p.m., three plain-clothes officers accosted her, demanded money, and, upon her refusal, physically assaulted her—punching her face and kicking her knee—before taking her to a vacant lot for further violence.
    • She presented a medical certificate dated April 14, 2003 noting swelling and tenderness on her left cheek and right groin.
  • Administrative Proceedings
    • Abenojar filed a complaint before NAPOLCOM; the Commission charged Besmonte, Anos, and Tuldanes with grave misconduct for unlawful arrest, assault, threats, and deprivation of liberty.
    • NAPOLCOM Decision (March 9, 2011): Exonerated Anos and Tuldanes; found Besmonte guilty of grave misconduct but imposed a one-rank demotion. Motion for reconsideration denied (May 16, 2017).
    • CSC Decision No. 180629 (November 22, 2018): Dismissed Besmonte’s appeal, affirmed guilt for grave misconduct, modified penalty to dismissal with accessory penalties. Motion for reconsideration denied (June 18, 2019).
    • Court of Appeals Decision (October 29, 2021): Dismissed Besmonte’s Rule 43 petition, affirmed CSC; Resolution (March 28, 2022) denied reconsideration.
    • Besmonte filed a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 before the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming Besmonte’s liability for grave misconduct and the penalty of dismissal from the service and its accessory penalties.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.