Case Digest (G.R. No. L-33320) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Ramon A. Gonzales v. The Philippine National Bank, petitioner Ramon A. Gonzales filed on January 11, 1969 in the Court of First Instance of Manila a special civil action for mandamus against respondent Philippine National Bank (PNB), seeking to inspect the bank’s records concerning (a) the US$23 million sugar-mill guarantee for Southern Negros Development Corporation, (b) the ₱21 million Cebu‐Mactan Bridge financing for V. C. Ponce, Inc., and (c) the Passi Sugar Mill construction by Honiron Philippines, Inc., after his written request was denied on January 23, 1969 by the bank’s Assistant Vice‐President and Legal Counsel on the ground that his motive as a one‐share stockholder was not germane and raised doubts. Before this action, petitioner had instituted several suits as both taxpayer and, from August 30, 1967, one‐share stockholder of PNB—Civil Cases Nos. 69345, 71044, 72936, and 76427—challenging various PNB transactions. The trial court dismissed Gonzales’s petition, rul Case Digest (G.R. No. L-33320) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Petition and Trial History
- Ramon A. Gonzales (petitioner) filed a special civil action for mandamus in the Court of First Instance of Manila against the Philippine National Bank (respondent), seeking to inspect the bank’s books and records concerning:
- The guarantee of Southern Negros Development Corporation’s US$23 million sugar-mill purchase.
- Financing of the ₱21 million Cebu–Mactan Bridge by V. C. Ponce, Inc.
- Construction of the Passi Sugar Mill at Iloilo by Honiron Philippines, Inc.
- The trial court denied the petition and dismissed the action, leading to this appeal.
- Prior Proceedings and Share Acquisition
- Before this action, petitioner instituted several taxpayer suits against PNB and its directors (Civil Cases Nos. 69345, 71044, 72936, 76427) challenging various bank transactions.
- During Civil Case No. 69345 (Aug. 1967), petitioner acquired one share of PNB stock (Aug. 30, 1967) to establish standing to question the bank’s letters of credit.
- Request for Inspection and Denial
- On January 11, 1969, petitioner formally requested in writing access to inspect PNB’s records relating to the above transactions.
- On January 23, 1969, PNB’s Legal Counsel denied the request, citing: lack of germane interest as a one-shareholder; doubtful motive; and confidentiality under the bank’s charter (Republic Act No. 1300, as amended).
- Petitioner filed the mandamus proceeding following the denial.
Issues:
- Whether a stockholder’s right to inspect corporate books under Section 51 of the old Corporation Law (Act No. 1459) or Section 74 of the new Corporation Code (B.P. Blg. 68) is absolute or conditioned upon good faith and legitimate purpose.
- Whether the confidentiality provisions of PNB’s charter (RA 1300, as amended) preclude a stockholder’s inspection despite the Corporation Code.
- Whether the petitioner failed to exhaust administrative remedies before seeking judicial relief.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)