Title
Gonzales vs. Philippine National Bank
Case
G.R. No. L-33320
Decision Date
May 30, 1983
A stockholder sought to inspect PNB's records under the Corporation Law, but the Supreme Court ruled the right is not absolute and requires good faith. PNB's charter confidentiality provisions prevailed, and the petitioner's motives were deemed speculative.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-33320)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Petition and Trial History
    • Ramon A. Gonzales (petitioner) filed a special civil action for mandamus in the Court of First Instance of Manila against the Philippine National Bank (respondent), seeking to inspect the bank’s books and records concerning:
      • The guarantee of Southern Negros Development Corporation’s US$23 million sugar-mill purchase.
      • Financing of the ₱21 million Cebu–Mactan Bridge by V. C. Ponce, Inc.
      • Construction of the Passi Sugar Mill at Iloilo by Honiron Philippines, Inc.
    • The trial court denied the petition and dismissed the action, leading to this appeal.
  • Prior Proceedings and Share Acquisition
    • Before this action, petitioner instituted several taxpayer suits against PNB and its directors (Civil Cases Nos. 69345, 71044, 72936, 76427) challenging various bank transactions.
    • During Civil Case No. 69345 (Aug. 1967), petitioner acquired one share of PNB stock (Aug. 30, 1967) to establish standing to question the bank’s letters of credit.
  • Request for Inspection and Denial
    • On January 11, 1969, petitioner formally requested in writing access to inspect PNB’s records relating to the above transactions.
    • On January 23, 1969, PNB’s Legal Counsel denied the request, citing: lack of germane interest as a one-shareholder; doubtful motive; and confidentiality under the bank’s charter (Republic Act No. 1300, as amended).
    • Petitioner filed the mandamus proceeding following the denial.

Issues:

  • Whether a stockholder’s right to inspect corporate books under Section 51 of the old Corporation Law (Act No. 1459) or Section 74 of the new Corporation Code (B.P. Blg. 68) is absolute or conditioned upon good faith and legitimate purpose.
  • Whether the confidentiality provisions of PNB’s charter (RA 1300, as amended) preclude a stockholder’s inspection despite the Corporation Code.
  • Whether the petitioner failed to exhaust administrative remedies before seeking judicial relief.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.