Title
Fortun vs. Macapagal-Arroyo
Case
G.R. No. 190293
Decision Date
Mar 20, 2012
The Supreme Court dismissed petitions challenging Proclamation 1959, finding them moot after its prompt withdrawal by President Arroyo, relating to a martial law declaration in Maguindanao.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 190293)

Facts:

  • Background of the Case
On November 23, 2009, 57 innocent civilians were brutally murdered in Maguindanao, Philippines, in what became known as the "Maguindanao massacre." In response, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo declared a state of emergency in Maguindanao, Sultan Kudarat, and Cotabato City on November 24, 2009, through Presidential Proclamation 1946.
  • Declaration of Martial Law
On December 4, 2009, President Arroyo issued Presidential Proclamation 1959, declaring martial law and suspending the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus in Maguindanao. This was done to address the lawless violence and rebellion in the province.
  • Report to Congress
On December 6, 2009, President Arroyo submitted a report to Congress, as required by Section 18, Article VII of the 1987 Constitution, detailing the factual basis for her actions. She cited the presence of heavily armed groups, the closure of government offices, and the use of unauthorized military equipment as reasons for the declaration.
  • Congressional Review
Congress convened on December 9, 2009, to review the proclamation. However, before Congress could act, President Arroyo lifted martial law and restored the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus on December 12, 2009, through Presidential Proclamation 1963.
  • Petitions Filed
Multiple petitions were filed challenging the constitutionality of Proclamation 1959. The petitioners argued that the declaration of martial law and suspension of the writ of habeas corpus were unconstitutional and lacked sufficient factual basis.

Issues:

  • Mootness of the Case
Whether the petitions challenging the constitutionality of Proclamation 1959 became moot after President Arroyo lifted martial law and restored the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus.
  • Constitutionality of Proclamation 1959
Whether the declaration of martial law and suspension of the writ of habeas corpus in Maguindanao had sufficient factual basis and complied with constitutional requirements.
  • Role of Congress and the Supreme Court
Whether the Supreme Court should review the constitutionality of Proclamation 1959, given that Congress had not yet acted on the matter before the proclamation was lifted.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.