Title
Fajardo vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 239823
Decision Date
Sep 25, 2019
Fajardo, a PCSO cashier, failed to account for P1.8M in public funds, admitted liability, and was convicted of malversation despite claims of duress and irregular audits. SC upheld the conviction.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 239823)

Facts:

  • Parties and Charge
    • Petitioner Angelica Anzia Fajardo was Cashier V and Officer-in-Charge, Division Chief III, Prize Payment (Teller) Division of the PCSO Treasury Department.
    • She was indicted for Malversation of Public Funds under Article 217, RPC, for misappropriating a ₱3,000,000 cash advance, of which ₱1,877,450 were found missing upon audit.
  • Audits and Investigations
    • On November 13, 2008, the PCSO Internal Audit Department (IAD) conducted a spot cash count, disclosing a ₱218,461 shortage; Fajardo was furnished the count sheet. Her vault was sealed on November 17, 2008.
    • Fajardo resumed duty on January 8, 2009; a joint audit with COA and PCSO revealed a total ₱1,877,450 deficit. She was served a demand letter on January 13, 2009 to explain or return missing funds within 72 hours.
  • Petitioner’s Response and Administrative Proceedings
    • On January 15, 2009, Fajardo requested more time to respond; on January 27, 2009, she admitted liability, offered ₱300,000 partial settlement and waived benefits.
    • The PCSO Legal Department found a prima facie administrative case and referred the matter for criminal filing.
  • Trial and Appellate Decisions
    • The RTC (February 17, 2017) convicted her of Malversation, sentencing her to 13 years and 4 months to 19 years and 4 months reclusion temporal, plus a ₱1,877,450 fine.
    • The Sandiganbayan (March 5, 2018) affirmed with modification under RA 10951, imposing prision mayor of 6 years and 1 day to 10 years and 1 day and the same fine; motion for reconsideration denied April 18, 2018.

Issues:

  • Whether the Sandiganbayan correctly found petitioner guilty of Malversation of Public Funds.
  • Whether Fajardo’s January 15 and 27, 2009 letters violated her rights to counsel or against self-incrimination.
  • Whether alleged irregularities in the spot audits or the theory of pilferage by a co-employee undermine her conviction.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.