Title
Enrile vs. Salazar
Case
G.R. No. 92163
Decision Date
Jun 5, 1990
The petition for habeas corpus was denied, affirming the validity of the rebellion charges and the proper issuance of the warrant of arrest.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 92163)

Facts:

  • On February 27, 1990, Juan Ponce Enrile was arrested by law enforcement officers led by Director Alfredo Lim of the NBI.
  • The arrest was based on a warrant issued by Judge Jaime Salazar of the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City in Criminal Case No. 90-10941.
  • Enrile was charged with rebellion, murder, and multiple frustrated murder related to a failed coup attempt from November 29 to December 10, 1990.
  • Following his arrest, Enrile was detained overnight at the NBI headquarters without bail.
  • The next day, he was transferred to Camp Tomas Karingal and placed under the custody of Brig. Gen. Edgardo Dula Torres.
  • On February 28, 1990, Enrile filed a petition for habeas corpus, alleging violations of his constitutional rights.
  • The Supreme Court issued a writ of habeas corpus returnable on March 5, 1990, and set a hearing for March 6, 1990.
  • The Solicitor General argued that the case did not fall under the precedent set by People vs. Hernandez.
  • The Court granted provisional liberty to Enrile and the Panlilio spouses, conditioned upon the posting of bail.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court ruled that the information filed against Enrile does charge an offense, specifically simple rebellion.
  • The Court found that a preliminary investigation was conducted, thus Enrile was not denied due process.
  • The Court held that the judge's actions in issuing the warrant were sufficient and did not violate constitutiona...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court reaffirmed the doctrine from People vs. Hernandez, stating that rebellion cannot be complexed with other crimes.
  • The Court clarified that the information against Enrile should be interpreted as charging simple rebellion, despite its phrasing.
  • The essence of the Hernandez ruling is to protect the accused from harsher penalties associated with complex c...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.