Title
Department of Health vs. Camposano
Case
G.R. No. 157684
Decision Date
Apr 27, 2005
Former DOH-NCR employees faced dismissal for procurement anomalies; Supreme Court annulled orders due to lack of independent assessment by Secretary of Health, remanding for proper due process.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 198994)

Facts:

  • Employment and Complaint
  • Respondents Priscilla B. Camposano (Finance and Management Officer II), Imelda Q. Agustin (Accountant I), and Enrique L. Perez (Acting Supply Officer III) were employees of the Department of Health–National Capital Region (DOH-NCR).
  • On May 15, 1996, concerned DOH-NCR employees filed a complaint with the Resident Ombudsman alleging an anomalous purchase of 1,500 bottles of Ferrous Sulfate capsules worth ₱330,000.
  • Investigation and Administrative Orders
  • On August 6, 1996, the Resident Ombudsman recommended formal charges of grave misconduct, dishonesty, and violation of RA 3019. On August 8, 1996, the Secretary of Health filed these charges.
  • By Administrative Order No. 298 (October 25, 1996), President Ramos created an Ad Hoc Committee (composed of PCAGC members) to investigate under PD 807. On January 23, 1998, the PCAGC found the respondents guilty and recommended dismissal. On April 20, 1998 (AO 390), President Ramos dismissed Dir. Majarais and remanded respondents’ records to the Health Secretary “for appropriate action.”
  • Procedural History
  • On May 8, 1998, Secretary Carmencita N. Reodica dismissed respondents by adopting the PCAGC resolution. On June 5, 1998, she denied their motion for reconsideration.
  • Respondents appealed to the Civil Service Commission (CSC), which denied their appeal (May 21, 1999) and reconsideration (September 30, 1999). Horacio Cabrera’s separate appeal succeeded at the Court of Appeals (October 15, 2001).
  • Respondents’ own petition to the CA (CA-GR SP No. 67720) was granted in a March 19, 2003 decision setting aside the CSC resolutions and ordering reinstatement with back pay. The DOH petitioned the Supreme Court under Rule 45.

Issues:

  • Jurisdiction
  • Did the Presidential Commission Against Graft and Corruption (PCAGC) lack jurisdiction to investigate non-presidential appointees?
  • Delegation and Decision-Making
  • Did the Secretary of Health relinquish her authority and act mechanically by merely adopting the PCAGC findings without independent assessment?
  • Sufficiency of Investigation
  • Did the Court of Appeals err in disregarding the exhaustive PCAGC investigation and its findings on the illegal purchase contract?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.