Title
De la Cerna vs. Potot
Case
G.R. No. L-20234
Decision Date
Dec 23, 1964
Spouses executed a joint will in 1939; probate decree for Bernabe’s estate upheld, but Gervasia’s share invalid due to joint will prohibition, requiring intestate succession.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-20234)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Proceedings
    • Petitioners: Paula de la Cerna and other heirs of Bernabe de la Cerna.
    • Respondents: Manuela Rebaca Potot (testamentary heir) and Court of Appeals, Sixth Division.
    • Procedural History: Appeal from C.A.-G.R. No. 23763-R reversing CFI Cebu (Civ. Case No. R-3819) which ordered dismissal of partition action.
  • Joint Last Will and Testament
    • On May 9, 1939, spouses Bernabe de la Cerna and Gervasia Rebaca executed a joint will in the local dialect:
      • Bequeathed two parcels of land in Sitio Bucao, Barrio Lugo, Borbon, Cebu (Tax Nos. 4676 and 6677) to their niece Manuela Rebaca (married to Nicolas Potot).
      • Reserved usufruct of both lands for their respective lifetimes.
    • Bernabe de la Cerna died on August 30, 1939.
  • Probate Proceedings
    • Special Proc. No. 499 (CI Cebu): On October 31, 1939, the court legalized Bernabe’s will, ordered summary distribution of his share to Manuela upon posting P500 bond.
    • Special Proc. No. 1016-R (CI Cebu): After Gervasia’s death on October 14, 1952, a petition to probate her share was filed November 6, 1952, but dismissed March 30, 1954 for failure to appear.
  • Lower Court Decisions on Partition
    • CFI Cebu (Civ. Case No. R-3819): Held the joint will void under Civil Code prohibition on joint wills (Art. 669 old; Art. 818 new) and ordered partition among intestate heirs.
    • Court of Appeals (CA-G.R. No. 23763-R): Reversed CFI, ruling the 1939 probate decree final and conclusive as to Bernabe’s will, dismissed partition action.

Issues:

  • Whether the 1939 final decree of probate of the joint will is conclusive as to its validity despite the Civil Code’s prohibition on joint wills.
  • Whether the 1939 probate decree can affect Gervasia Rebaca’s interest, given that her share was not then before the probate court.
  • Whether, in the absence of a valid will by Gervasia, her undivided interest should pass to her intestate heirs upon her death.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.