Title
De Guzman vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. L-47822
Decision Date
Dec 22, 1988
A merchant sued a junk dealer for cargo loss after a hijacking. The Supreme Court ruled the dealer, a common carrier, was not liable due to force majeure, as the hijacking was unforeseeable and beyond reasonable control.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-47822)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Background
    • Ernesto Cendana, respondent, was a junk dealer in Pangasinan who back-hauled goods from Manila to Pangasinan using his two six-wheeler trucks, charging below-market freight rates.
    • Pedro de Guzman, petitioner, was a merchant and authorized dealer of General Milk Company in Urdaneta, Pangasinan.
  • Contract and Loss of Goods
    • In November 1970, Guzman contracted Cendana for the hauling of 750 cartons of Liberty filled milk from Makati to Urdaneta, delivery by December 4, 1970.
    • On December 1, 1970, Cendana loaded 150 cartons on his own‐driven truck and 600 cartons on a second truck driven by his employee Manuel Estrada. Only the 150 cartons reached petitioner; the second truck was hijacked along MacArthur Highway in Paniqui, Tarlac, by armed men who took the vehicle, its driver, helper, and cargo.
  • Procedural History
    • On January 6, 1971, Guzman sued in the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan for P22,150.00 (value of lost goods), damages, and attorney’s fees, alleging Cendana was a common carrier liable for non-delivery.
    • The trial court (Dec. 10, 1975) found Cendana a common carrier and awarded the full claim plus damages and fees.
    • The Court of Appeals reversed on August 3, 1977, ruling that Cendana was not a common carrier but merely engaged in casual back‐hauling, and that the hijacking was force majeure.

Issues:

  • Whether Ernesto Cendana was properly characterized as a common carrier under Article 1732 of the Civil Code.
  • Whether the hijacking of the truck constituted force majeure exempting the carrier from liability under Articles 1734 and 1735 of the Civil Code.
  • Whether Cendana, as a common carrier, was liable for the value of the undelivered milk cartons.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.