Title
Supreme Court
Chua vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. 231998
Decision Date
Nov 20, 2017
Eric Sibayan Chua sought to change his surname from "Kiat" to "Chua" to align with lifelong usage, supported by evidence and community recognition. SC granted the petition, citing avoidance of confusion and administrative complications.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 231998)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background of the Case
    • Eric Sibayan Chua, originally registered as "Eric Sibayan Kiat," filed a petition seeking to change his surname from "Kiat" to "Chua."
    • The petition was based on two major factual assertions:
      • His father, Cheong Kiat, had allegedly obtained a court judgment in China permitting him to change his surname to "Chua."
      • Eric had continuously used the name "Eric Sibayan Chua" in all his credentials and was popularly known in his community as "Eric Chua."
  • Proceedings in the Regional Trial Court (RTC)
    • The petition was docketed as Special Proceeding Case No. 907 before the RTC, Branch 34, Balaoan, La Union.
    • During trial (commenced on May 21, 2013), Eric testified that:
      • He could not secure a copy of his father’s birth certificate because his father was born in China.
      • His mother, Melania, confirmed that Cheong had changed his surname from "Kiat" to "Chua," which led to Eric’s adoption of the surname "Chua."
    • Documentary evidence presented included:
      • Certificate of Baptism
      • Voter Certification
      • Police Clearance
      • National Bureau of Investigation Clearance
      • Passport
      • High School Diploma
      • Certificates of Live Birth of his children
    • All the aforementioned documents, except his original Certificate of Live Birth, reflected the surname "Chua."
  • Testimonies and Additional Evidence
    • Testimony of Melania (Eric’s mother):
      • Confirmed that Cheong used the surname "Kiat" in China but adopted "Chua" when in the Philippines.
      • Asserted that the registration error in Eric’s birth certificate was due to a mistake by her uncle.
      • Stated that Cheong had long since left and returned to China when Eric was 16.
    • Community corroboration was provided by Eric’s neighbor, Avelino Fernandez, who verified that Eric was known as "Eric Chua."
  • Decisions and Procedural History
    • Regional Trial Court (January 22, 2014 Decision)
      • The RTC found that the petition was essentially a matter of straightening the records.
      • It ordered the Local Civil Registrar to change Eric’s name from "ERIC S. KIAT" to "ERIC S. CHUA" and directed the necessary corrections in the National Statistics Office records.
    • Court of Appeals (CA) Rulings
      • On November 7, 2016, the CA reversed the RTC decision and dismissed Eric’s petition on the grounds of insufficient proof:
        • The CA held that Eric failed to present compelling evidence that his father had legally changed his surname.
        • It asserted that the testimonies of both Eric and his mother were mere allegations lacking preponderant evidence.
        • The CA also noted that no proof was offered to demonstrate any prejudice to Eric from using his registered name "Kiat."
      • Through its May 19, 2017 Resolution, the CA denied Eric’s motion for reconsideration.
    • Supreme Court Petition
      • Eric elevated his case for review on certiorari under Rule 45, challenging the CA’s dismissal.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing Eric’s petition for a change of name on the basis that:
    • There was insufficient evidence to prove that Eric’s father had legally changed his surname from "Kiat" to "Chua."
    • The testimonies of Eric and his mother were inadequate to constitute preponderant proof for the change.
  • Whether, considering Eric’s continuous use of the name "Chua" and the multiple credentials reflecting that surname, denying the name change would cause confusion and prejudice his personal identity and that of his children.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.