Case Digest (G.R. No. 196249)
Facts:
- Petition for Review on Certiorari filed by Rose Hana Angeles and Zenaida Angeles, operating Las Marias Grill and Restaurant and Cafeteria Bar and Restaurant.
- Challenged the November 30, 2010 Decision and March 22, 2011 Resolution of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 109083.
- The CA upheld the December 28, 2007 Decision and March 30, 2009 Resolution of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) in NLRC CASE CA No. 026347-00.
- Originated from consolidated complaints for illegal dismissal and money claims by various respondents, including Ferdinand Bucad and Charleston Reynante.
- Allegations included underpayment of wages, non-coverage under the Social Security System (SSS), and illegal termination without just cause.
- Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of respondents, finding illegal dismissal and ordering payment of back wages and other claims.
- Petitioners appealed to the NLRC, claiming complaints were fabricated by Bucad to distract from his poor performance.
- NLRC dismissed the appeal; CA modified the ruling for two respondents but affirmed findings for others.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Court of Appeals did not err in concluding that Joel Ducusin was illegally terminated.
- The petitioners failed to discharge the burden of proving that...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the decisions of the lower courts, stating it does not re-evaluate factual issues, focusing on errors of law.
- The findings of the Labor Arbiter and NLRC, supported by substantial evidence, were given significant weight.
- Ducusin's prompt filing of a labor complaint indicated he did not abandon his employment, countering petitioners' cla...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 196249)
Facts:
The case involves a Petition for Review on Certiorari filed by Rose Hana Angeles and Zenaida Angeles, doing business as Las Marias Grill and Restaurant and Cafeteria Bar and Restaurant, respectively. The petitioners challenged the November 30, 2010 Decision and March 22, 2011 Resolution of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 109083, which upheld the December 28, 2007 Decision and March 30, 2009 Resolution of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) in NLRC CASE CA No. 026347-00. The case originated from consolidated complaints for illegal dismissal and money claims filed by various respondents against the petitioners, alleging underpayment of wages, non-coverage under the Social Security System (SSS), and illegal termination without just cause. The respondents included Ferdinand Bucad, Charleston Reynante, and others, who claimed they were subjected to various labor violations, including delayed salary payments and maltreatment. The Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of the respondents, finding the petitioners guilty of illegal dismissal and ordering them to pay back wages and other monetary claims. The petitioners appealed to the NLRC, asserting that the complaints were fabricated by Bucad, who they claimed was trying...