Title
Aggabao vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 163756
Decision Date
Jan 26, 2005
A congressional election dispute arose over contested COCVs, leading to Miranda's proclamation. Aggabao challenged via certiorari, but the Supreme Court ruled HRET had exclusive jurisdiction post-proclamation.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 221075)

Facts:

  • Parties and Election Context
    • Georgidi B. Aggabao and Anthony Miranda were rival candidates for Congressman of the 4th District of Isabela in the May 10, 2004 elections.
    • During the canvassing of Certificates of Canvass of Votes (COCV) for the municipalities of Cordon and San Agustin, Miranda moved to exclude the 1st copy of the COCV, alleging tampering, duress in preparation, and manifest errors.
  • Proceedings Before the Provincial Board of Canvassers (PBC) and COMELEC
    • On May 22, 2004, the reconstituted PBC excluded the contested COCVs and used the 4th and 7th copies instead; Miranda emerged as having the highest votes.
    • On June 6–9, 2004, Miranda filed a “Very Urgent Motion for Proclamation,” Commissioner Sadain approved the proclamation of winning candidates in a June 8 memorandum, and the COMELEC En Banc issued Resolution No. 7233 directing Miranda’s proclamation; Aggabao filed motions opposing proclamation and sought a temporary restraining order.
    • On June 14, 2004, Miranda was proclaimed as Congressman; two days later, Aggabao filed a petition for certiorari before the Supreme Court assailing Resolution No. 7233 for lack of jurisdiction.
  • Proceedings in the Supreme Court
    • Miranda moved to dismiss the petition, arguing that the proper forum was the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET).
    • On August 16, 2004, the COMELEC Second Division gave due course to Aggabao’s appeal but did not annul the proclamation; Aggabao filed a Consolidated Motion for Early Resolution and Reply.

Issues:

  • Remedy Appropriateness
    • Whether a petition for certiorari is the proper remedy to annul the COMELEC En Banc’s Resolution No. 7233 and Miranda’s proclamation.
    • Whether the pendency of Aggabao’s appeal before the COMELEC Second Division bars Miranda’s proclamation.
  • Jurisdictional Authority
    • Whether the COMELEC En Banc acted without or in excess of jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion in ordering the proclamation.
    • Whether post-proclamation election contests are within COMELEC’s jurisdiction or exclusively within the HRET.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.