G.R. No. 86439 - Bautista vs. Salonga

Ask AI

G.R. No. 86439: Bautista vs. Salonga

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the case?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Bautista vs. Salonga

Case: G.R. No. 86439

Decision Date: Apr 13, 1989

Mary Bautista's CHR appointment did not require CA confirmation; her permanent role was valid, rendering a second appointment void. EO 163-A was unconstitutional, as it compromised CHR independence.

appointment

confirmation

independence

Very Long 49 min

2.9x of typical case length

END