G.R. No. 143375 - Bautista vs. Court of Appeals

Bautista vs. Court of Appeals

Getting related questions...
Conversations stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. Know more about your privacy jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Bautista vs. Court of Appeals

Case: G.R. No. 143375

Decision Date: Jul 6, 2001

Petitioner issued a check that was dishonored for insufficient funds; Supreme Court ruled 90-day presentment period under BP 22 is not essential, affirming prosecution's discretion.

prosecutor

appealable

grave abuse of discretion

Standard 19 min

END