Title
Monetary penalty guidelines for bank violations
Law
Bsp Circular No. 496
Decision Date
Sep 29, 2005
BSP Circular No. 496 establishes monetary penalty guidelines for banks and quasi-banks, categorizing offenses as serious, less serious, or minor, with penalties determined by the nature of the offense and the institution's asset size, while considering aggravating and mitigating factors in the imposition of sanctions.

Classification of Offenses

  • Serious Offense: unsafe or unsound banking practice risking material loss, damage, or undue injury involving manifest partiality, bad faith, or gross negligence.
  • Less Serious Offense: major violations of banking laws, regulations, or supervisory directives impacting solvency, liquidity, or profitability but not unsafe practices.
  • Minor Offense: procedural violations easily corrected without material financial impact.

Definition of Serious Offense Criteria

  • Acts contrary to prudent banking resulting in abnormal financial risk or loss.
  • Consideration of impact on capital, assets, management, earnings, and liquidity.
  • Specific acts include material losses to institution or stakeholders, injury from gross negligence, or disadvantageous contracts.

Penalty Rates for Asset Size Categories

  • Serious offenses attract penalties from P500 to P30,000 depending on asset size.
  • Less serious offenses penalties range from P300 to P20,000.
  • Minor offenses penalties range from P150 to P10,000.

Penalty Determination Methodology

  • Two-step assessment: (1) classify offense nature; (2) evaluate aggravating and mitigating factors.
  • Aggravating factors increase penalty, mitigating factors reduce it.
  • Penalties imposed without prejudice to non-monetary sanctions.
  • Violations with specific penal provisions excluded from this guideline.

Aggravating Factors

  • Frequency of violations within a three-year period.
  • Duration of violation prior to detection (over one year considered long).
  • Continuation of violation after official notification.
  • Concealment efforts indicating intent to defraud regulators.
  • Magnitude of loss or risk of loss to the bank.
  • Impact on bank’s reputation and the broader banking industry.

Mitigating Factors

  • Good faith or absence of intent to violate.
  • Full cooperation with regulators during investigation.
  • Positive remedial actions or reforms undertaken even if not immediate.
  • Voluntary disclosure of violations before detection by authorities.

Implementation and Effectivity

  • Guidelines approved by the Monetary Board in 2005.
  • Effective 15 days after publication in Official Gazette or newspaper of general circulation.
  • Penalties supplement powers of the Monetary Board in regulatory enforcement and ensuring sound banking practice.

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.