Title
Rice Fortification Implementation Guidelines
Law
Nfa No. 195-2k4
Decision Date
Nov 4, 2004
The NFA Council mandates the phased implementation of iron fortification in rice, placing the responsibility and associated costs on millers and importers, in compliance with the Food Fortification Program established by RA 8976.

Legal basis and governing framework

  • The resolution is adopted to comply with Republic Act No. 8976, An Act Establishing the Food Fortification Program and for Other Purposes.
  • The implementation is tied to the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 8976.
  • The amendments explicitly relate to NFA Letter-Circular 2004 No. AO-2K4-07-001 dated June 15, 2004 on iron fortified rice and rice-based products.

Policy intent for iron fortified rice

  • Rice fortification with iron is made part of the Food Fortification Program framework under Republic Act No. 8976.
  • Industry transition is handled through gradual or phase by phase implementation based on industry capability.
  • The cost burden for additional fortification is assigned to supply-side actors rather than farmers.
  • Legal compliance responsibilities are allocated to parties in the rice production and distribution chain as specified in the resolution.

Scope and who must comply

  • Palay millers have the sole responsibility for rice fortification.
  • Rice importers have the sole responsibility for rice fortification.
  • Palay owners have the sole responsibility for rice fortification when the rice is not owned by the millers.
  • The resolution governs iron fortified rice and rice-based products under the NFA fortification implementation system.

Core implementation rules (phase and cost)

  • Implementation shall proceed gradually or “phase by phase” in accordance with the capability of the industry.
  • Rice fortification is assigned as the sole responsibility of palay millers, rice importers, and palay owners where applicable under the ownership condition.
  • Any additional cost of fortifying rice shall be shouldered by the millers, not by the farmers.
  • Mandatory fortification is required to commence on 07 November 2004.

Compliance responsibility and superseding clause

  • Compliance with the fortification requirement is the sole responsibility of millers/importers.
  • Compliance responsibility shifts to rice/palay owners if rice is not owned by the millers.
  • All provisions of NFA Letter-Circular 2004 No. AO-2K4-07-001 dated June 15, 2004 that are inconsistent with the above rules are deemed superseded.

Adopting authority and signatories

  • The resolution is approved by the NFA Council.
  • The resolution’s approval and notice are signed by Ofelia Cortez-Reyes as Board Secretary.
  • The notice is signed by Alexander A. Padilla, Undersecretary for Health Regulation of the Department of Health, adopting the agreed considerations on 04 Nov. 2004.
  • The notice is also signed by Gregorio Y. Tan, Jr., Administrator, National Food Authority (NFA).

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.