Title
Philippine Food Fortification Program IRR
Law
Doh Department Circular No. 97, S. 2004
Decision Date
Mar 3, 2004
The Department of Health establishes guidelines for the Philippine Food Fortification Program, mandating the fortification of staple foods like rice, wheat flour, refined sugar, and cooking oil with essential nutrients to combat nutritional deficiencies and promote public health.

Law Summary

Declaration of Policies

  • Grounded in the constitutional right to health and health consciousness.
  • Recognizes prevalent nutritional deficiencies in the Philippines (energy, iron, vitamin A, iodine, thiamin, riboflavin).
  • Endorses food fortification as a vital public health strategy to compensate dietary inadequacies based on Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA).

Definitions of Key Terms

  • Defines terms such as fortification, fortificant, micronutrient, staple food, acceptable standards, manufacturers, importers, repackers, and nutritional labeling.
  • Clarifies responsibilities and scope of actors involved (e.g., manufacturers, importers, tollers).
  • Establishes the Sangkap Pinoy Seal Program as a voluntary fortification incentive.

Scope of the Philippine Food Fortification Program

  • Covers all imported or locally processed foods for human consumption, excluding certain exceptions.
  • Two systems: voluntary fortification and mandatory fortification for specified staple foods.
  • Applies to manufacturers, importers, traders, repackers, retailers, and food service establishments.
  • Licensing and registration mandated prior to distribution.

Voluntary Food Fortification

  • Encouraged under the Sangkap Pinoy Seal Program (SPSP).
  • Manufacturers opting not to register must comply with DOH fortification standards.
  • Fortification should follow DOH guidelines to avoid under or overfortification.

Mandatory Food Fortification

  • Staple foods subject to mandatory fortification: rice (with iron), wheat flour (with vitamin A and iron), refined sugar (with vitamin A), cooking oil (with vitamin A).
  • Setting of minimum acceptable and maximum tolerable fortification levels by the DOH through BFAD in consultation with industry and regulatory bodies.
  • Responsibilities:
    • Manufacturers/tollees for local processing.
    • Manufacturers for imported products; importers responsible if not fortified at source.
    • Repackers to only repack fortified products.
  • Labeling of fortified foods must include fortificant and quantity.

Quality Assurance

  • Establishment of a government-led quality assurance system.
  • Manufacturers and importers must maintain compatible quality assurance protocols.
  • General Quality Assurance System Guide annexed.

Implementation, Monitoring, and Review

  • DOH through BFAD is lead implementing and monitoring agency.
  • Promotion via SPSP including collection of fees for activities and registration.
  • NNC serves as advisory body conducting periodic reviews using national nutrition surveys.
  • Collaboration with other agencies (SRA, NFA, PCA, Bureau of Customs).
  • Local Government Units participate in monitoring fortified food in markets and establishments.
  • Mandatory reporting by industry on production and marketing.
  • Customs to notify DOH about imports of staple foods for fortification verification.

Support to Affected Manufacturers

  • Support from Department of Trade and Industry, Department of Science and Technology, Land Bank, and Livelihood Corporation.
  • Provision of financial assistance, incentives, technology transfer, and access to government analytical laboratories.
  • Tax incentives available for early fortification adopters.
  • Agencies to allocate budget portions for program support.

Non-Compliance and Exceptions

  • Non-compliance includes deviations from required fortification levels, use of unapproved fortificants, and failure to follow quality assurance.
  • Exceptions allowed for dietary supplements and export or processing products subject to BFAD approval.

Administrative Sanctions

  • Sanctions after due notice and hearing include:
    • Denial or suspension of product registration.
    • Product recall orders.
    • Graduated fines starting at 300,000 PHP to 1,000,000 PHP for repeated violations.
    • Joint liability of responsible persons and juridical entities.
  • Maximum penalties for willful deceit include revocation of licenses.
  • Appeal process involves an adjudication board comprising BFAD, DILG, DTI, relevant regulatory agencies, and industry representatives.

International Commitments

  • The Act does not intend to violate existing treaties or international agreements of the Philippines.

Repealing Clause

  • Repeals inconsistent DOH/BFAD administrative orders or rulings on food fortification.

Separability Clause

  • Invalidity of any provision does not affect the remainder of the Rules.

Amendments

  • Amendments to the IRR require consultative meetings among involved agencies as per Section 12 of RA 8976.

Effectivity

  • Voluntary fortification provisions effective 30 days after publication.
  • Mandatory fortification effective four years after RA effectivity date (November 7, 2004).

This comprehensive framework governs the fortification of staple foods to address nutritional deficiencies, involving multi-agency cooperation, quality assurance, monitoring, sanctions, and support mechanisms.


Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.