Title
Supreme Court
DOJ Rules on Cybercrime Prevention Act 2012
Law
Doj Rules And Regulations Implementing Republic Act No. 10175, Otherwise Known As The "cybercrime Prevention Act Of 2012"
Decision Date
Aug 12, 2015
The Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 provides guidelines for the protection of computer systems and data, enforcement of cybercrime laws, and international cooperation in combating cybercrimes in the Philippines.

Law Summary

Declaration of Policy

  • Recognizes vital role of ICT industries in social and economic development.
  • Aims to provide an environment for free, easy access to information and protection of computer systems.
  • Seeks to make punishable all forms of misuse, abuse, and illegal access to computer data and systems.
  • Adopts powers for effective prevention, detection, investigation, and prosecution at domestic and international levels.

Definitions

  • Provides comprehensive definitions of terms such as Access, Alteration, Computer, Computer System, Digital Evidence, Cybersex, Cybersecurity, Service Provider, Traffic Data, and more.
  • Defines key concepts like Critical Infrastructure, National Cybersecurity Plan, and Forensics relevant to cybercrime prevention.

Core Cybercrime Offenses and Penalties

  • Enumerates core offenses including Illegal Access, Illegal Interception, Data Interference, System Interference, and Misuse of Devices.
  • Penalties range from prison terms of prision mayor and fines from P200,000 to amounts commensurate to damage incurred.
  • Enhanced penalties apply when offenses are committed against critical infrastructure.

Computer-Related Offenses

  • Includes Computer-related Forgery, Fraud, and Identity Theft.
  • Punishments include prison terms and fines similar to core offenses, adjusted for damage or intent.

Content-Related Offenses

  • Child Pornography punishable under RA 9775 with penalty one degree higher if committed through computer systems.

Other Cybercrimes

  • Includes Cyber-squatting (acquisition of domain names in bad faith), Cybersex, and Online Libel.
  • Specifies penalties varying from prision mayor to fines ranging from P6,000 upwards.
  • Provisions on aiding, abetting, and attempts included.

Corporate Liability

  • Juridical persons may be held liable for offenses committed on their behalf or benefit.
  • Fines can reach up to P10 million depending on degree of control or negligence.
  • Criminal liability of natural persons remains unaffected.

Relation to Other Laws

  • Cybercrimes committed through ICT may receive penalties one degree higher than prescribed by the Revised Penal Code or special laws.
  • Prosecution under this Act does not preclude liability under other laws, with specific exceptions noted.

Enforcement Authorities

  • NBI and PNP responsible for enforcement, each with designated cybercrime units.
  • DOJ-Office of Cybercrime coordinates efforts and supervises law enforcement cybercrime divisions.

Powers and Duties of Law Enforcement

  • Investigate cybercrimes, conduct forensic analysis, formulate investigation guidelines.
  • Provide technological support, maintain databases, and assist national cybersecurity efforts.
  • Submit timely reports and comply with procedures issued by competent authorities.

Preservation, Collection, and Disclosure of Computer Data

  • Service providers must preserve traffic and subscriber data for six months, content data upon order.
  • Law enforcement needs court-issued warrants to collect, disclose, or seize computer data.
  • Orders for disclosure must be complied with within 72 hours.

Search, Seizure, Custody and Destruction of Computer Data

  • Warrants authorize search, seizure, forensic examination, and securing of computer data.
  • Custody protocols require sealed court deposits and affidavits to maintain integrity.
  • Destroy preserved data after case termination or court order.

Exclusionary Rule and Non-compliance

  • Evidence obtained without a valid warrant or beyond its authority is inadmissible.
  • Non-compliance with lawful orders punishable by imprisonment or fines.

Liability of Service Providers

  • Service providers are not liable for user-generated content unless aware of wrongdoing and financially benefited.
  • Obligations under contract or law and court orders for injunctive relief remain binding.

Jurisdiction and Venue

  • Regional Trial Courts have jurisdiction over violations committed wholly or partly in the Philippines.
  • Venue lies where any element of the crime, damages, or computer system location is.
  • Special cybercrime courts and designated prosecutors/investigators established.

International Cooperation

  • Act supports mutual legal assistance based on international treaties and domestic laws.
  • DOJ coordinates requests for preservation, interception, access, and extradition related to cybercrimes.
  • Dual criminality waived for data preservation requests with exceptions for political offenses.

Competent Authorities

  • Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center (CICC) composed of representatives from DOST, NBI, PNP, DOJ, private sector, and academe.
  • CICC formulates cybersecurity plans, oversees cybercrime cases, facilitates cooperation, and conducts awareness programs.
  • DOJ Office of Cybercrime serves as central authority and operations center.
  • DOST-ICT Office operates Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) for cybersecurity coordination.

Duties of Service Providers

  • Preserve data for mandated periods, maintain confidentiality of preservation orders.
  • Cooperate with law enforcement in collection and disclosure of data.
  • In child pornography cases, install blocking technology and notify authorities.
  • Preserve customer records for investigations.

Prescribed Forms and Procedures

  • DOJ Office of Cybercrime to issue guidelines, templates, and procedures for investigation and evidence handling congruent with international best practices.

Appropriations, Separability, and Effectivity

  • Annual budget of P50 million appropriated for implementation.
  • Invalid provisions do not affect the remainder of rules.
  • These rules take effect 15 days after publication in at least two newspapers of general circulation.

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.