Finality of Historical Commission's Naming Decisions

Ask AI

PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 106: Finality of Historical Commission's Naming Decisions

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the law?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Finality of Historical Commission's Naming Decisions

Law: Presidential Decree No. 106

Decision Date: Jan 24, 1973

Presidential Decree No. 106 declares the final and binding authority of the National Historical Commission in naming and renaming historical buildings and landmarks, while also repealing or modifying conflicting provisions in existing laws and regulations, with immediate effect upon its issuance.

national historical commission

A

Limitations Regarding Streets and Plazas

Decisions related to the naming and renaming of streets and plazas by the NHC are only recommendatory in nature.
Such recommendations do not carry binding authority and may be subject to other governmental approvals or legislative actions.

Repeal and Modification of Conflicting Laws

All laws, executive orders, or regulations that conflict with the provisions of this decree are repealed or modified to conform with it.
This ensures legal consistency and prevents overlapping jurisdiction in naming historical sites.

Legal Effect and Implementation

This decree is declared part of the law of the land.
It took effect immediately upon promulgation, ensuring immediate legal enforceability.

Source of Authority

The decree is issued under the constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, particularly following Proclamation No. 1081 and General Order No. 1, providing the legal basis for the decree's enactment.

END