Title
Permissible Cosmetic Claims on Exfoliating Products
Law
Bfad Bureau Circular No. 23, S. 1999
Decision Date
Nov 24, 1999
The Bureau of Food and Drugs clarifies permissible claims for cosmetic preparations, specifically allowing terms like "exfoliate" and "exfoliant," provided that adequate evidence supports their efficacy in promoting skin renewal and treating acne.

Policy purpose and claim clarification

  • BFAD issues guidance to clarify and guide concerned personnel and clients on the use of specific words and cosmetic claims.
  • BFAD focuses the clarification on the evaluation of cosmetic labelling that uses “Exfoliate” and “Exfoliant.”
  • BFAD provides the functional basis of the terms to guide whether a claim is acceptable for cosmetic products.

Meaning of exfoliants and intent

  • “Exfoliants” are fundamentally described as astringents intended to encourage desquamation of the stratum corneum of the skin.
  • Examples of ingredients cited as applicable to exfoliants include witch hazel, salicylic acid, and alpha hydroxy acids.
  • Exfoliants are described as being prepared for oily skin.
  • Exfoliants are described as being intended in place of astringents in cleansing regimens for acne-prone persons.

Acceptable cosmetic claims for exfoliating products

  • BFAD declares the following claims acceptable for cosmetics labelling when substantive evidence is submitted and/or when the formulation itself supports the claim:
    • Exfoliants
    • Exfoliate
    • Remove or shed-off adeada skin surface cells
    • Uncover anewa skin that looks cleaner, fresher and finer
    • Accelerate the natural renewal of skin cells
    • Aid in the treatment of acne by alleviating comedones
  • BFAD states that the acceptable claims above include those similar to these.

Evidence and formulation requirements

  • BFAD requires submission of substantive evidence for acceptable claims under the circular.
  • BFAD also accepts support through the cosmetic formulation itself.
  • BFAD allows these acceptable claims to be evaluated favorably when the product formulation and evidence substantiate the claimed action, benefit, or advantage.

Evaluation of other words and phrases

  • BFAD directs that words and phrases not included in the enumerated acceptable list will be evaluated based on technical evidence submitted.
  • Technical evidence must substantiate the action, benefit, or advantage that the other words or phrases depict.
  • The evaluation approach applies to alternative wording that is intended to communicate effects related to exfoliating.

Adoption and effect in guidance

  • The circular is adopted on 24 Nov. 1999.
  • BFAD adopts the clarified claim standards for purposes of evaluation of cosmetic labelling involving exfoliating terminology.

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.