Title
LETTER OF INSTRUCTIONS NO. 1233
Date
May 1, 1982
A directive issued in 1982 instructs government officials to conduct a feasibility study for the establishment of an affordable sports and recreation complex near Metro-Manila, exclusively for the working masses and their families, in order to promote their welfare and health.
Font Size:

Law Summary

Purpose of the Directive

  • Explanation: The directive aims to promote the welfare and health of Filipino citizens by enhancing recreational facilities.
  • Key Definition: "Working masses" refers to the employed population and their families, who are the intended beneficiaries of the proposed facilities.

Study of Feasibility

  • Explanation: The directive instructs certain government officials to conduct a feasibility study for establishing a sports and recreation complex.
  • Important Requirements:
    • The complex should be located near or within Metro-Manila.
    • It must cater exclusively to the working masses and their families.
    • The facilities are to be provided at minimum cost to the users.

Reporting Requirements

  • Explanation: The directive mandates the submission of a report on the feasibility study's findings.
  • Relevant Timeframe:
    • The report is required to be submitted within thirty (30) days from the issuance of this directive.

Signatory Authority

  • Explanation: The directive is signed by Ferdinand E. Marcos, who was the President of the Philippines at the time of issuance.
  • Important Detail: This emphasizes the authority and the binding nature of the instructions provided in the letter.

Key Takeaways

  • The Letter of Instructions No. 1233 emphasizes the establishment of a recreational facility for the working masses in Metro-Manila.
  • A feasibility study is mandated, with a report due within thirty days.
  • The initiative reflects a national policy to enhance public welfare through accessible sports and recreation opportunities.

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research tool in the Philippines with case digests and full jurisprudence. AI summaries highlight key points but might skip important details or context. Always check the full text for accuracy.