Title
Republic Act No. 10175
Date
Sep 12, 2012
The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 aims to protect computer systems and data from misuse and illegal access, listing various cybercrime offenses and specifying penalties, while also establishing enforcement and implementation procedures, jurisdiction, international cooperation, and the central authority for cybercrime prevention and suppression.
Font Size:

Law Summary

1. Title

  • Legal Document: This Act shall be known as the "Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012."

2. Declaration of Policy

  • Legal Principle: The State recognizes the significance of information and communications technologies (ICT) in national development and the necessity to protect computer systems and data integrity.
  • Key Requirements:
    • The State will implement measures to prevent, investigate, and prosecute cybercrime.
    • Emphasis on international cooperation for effective enforcement.

3. Definition of Terms

  • Key Definitions:
    • Access: Utilization of resources of a computer system or network.
    • Alteration: Modification of existing computer data or programs.
    • Cybersecurity: Tools and policies to protect cyberspace.
    • Traffic Data: Non-content data related to communication such as origin, destination, etc.

4. Cybercrime Offenses

  • Legal Principle: Various acts are classified as cybercrime offenses.
  • Key Offenses:
    • Illegal Access: Accessing a computer system without authorization.
    • Data Interference: Alteration or destruction of data without rights.
    • Cyber-squatting: Acquiring domain names in bad faith.
    • Cybersex and Child Pornography: Engaging in or distributing obscene materials via a computer.

5. Other Offenses

  • Legal Principle: Aiding, abetting, or attempting cybercrime also constitutes an offense.
  • Consequences: Individuals involved in these activities can also face penalties.

6. Penalties

  • Legal Principle: Specific penalties are prescribed for each type of cybercrime offense.
  • Key Penalties:
    • Imprisonment of "prision mayor" or fines ranging from PhP200,000 to PhP500,000 for various offenses.
    • Increased penalties for acts against critical infrastructure.

7. Corporate Liability

  • Legal Principle: Corporations can be held liable for cybercrimes committed on their behalf.
  • Key Requirements:
    • Fines imposed can be double the standard fines for individuals.
    • Liability does not absolve individual criminal responsibility.

8. Enforcement and Implementation

  • Legal Principle: Designated authorities enforce the provisions of this Act.
  • Key Authorities:
    • NBI and PNP: Tasked with organizing cybercrime units.
    • Reporting Requirements: Regular reports to the DOJ regarding investigations.

9. Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data

  • Legal Principle: Law enforcement can collect traffic data under specific conditions.
  • Key Procedures:
    • Requires a court warrant based on reasonable grounds.
    • Data must be preserved for a minimum of six months.

10. Jurisdiction

  • Legal Principle: Regional Trial Courts hold jurisdiction over violations.
  • Key Details:
    • Jurisdiction applies to offenses committed by Filipino nationals regardless of location.

11. International Cooperation

  • Legal Principle: The Act promotes cooperation based on international agreements.
  • Important Details: Full force and effect of international instruments in investigations.

12. Final Provisions

  • Key Requirements:
    • Annual appropriations of PhP50,000,000 for implementation.
    • Joint formulation of implementing rules by relevant departments within 90 days.
  • Repealing Clause: Inconsistent laws are repealed or modified.

Key Takeaways

  • The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 establishes a legal framework to combat cybercrime, defining various offenses and their penalties.
  • It emphasizes the importance of cybersecurity and the role of ICT in national development.
  • Law enforcement agencies have specific responsibilities and powers to combat cybercrime, including real-time data collection and preservation.
  • Corporations can face significant penalties for offenses committed on their behalf, highlighting the importance of compliance.

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research tool in the Philippines with case digests and full jurisprudence. AI summaries highlight key points but may miss details, so always refer to the full text for accuracy.

You can use Jur as a traditional legal research tool. Click to only show full texts.