Title
PRC BOARD OF MEDICINE NO. 232
Date
Aug 9, 1990
The Board of Medicine proposes the implementation of a computerized correction system for medical board examinations to reduce processing time, minimize human error, and enhance the integrity of the examination results, effective from August 1990.
Font Size:

Law Summary

Background and Rationale

This section provides the context for the resolution and outlines the issues prompting the proposal for computerized correction of examination papers.

  • Concise Explanation: The current manual correction process for examination papers is inefficient, taking about one minute per paper and resulting in a total correction period of 3 to 4 months.
  • Key Definitions:
    • "Marked papers": Examination papers suspected of being tampered with or altered.
  • Important Requirements/Procedures:
    • The Board of Medicine aims to address issues of human error, tampering, and complaints from examinees regarding alleged fixers.
  • Relevant Timeframes: The manual process currently requires several months to complete.
  • Consequences: The integrity of the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) is at risk due to potential anomalies in the examination results.

Proposal for Computerized Correction

This section details the proposed solution to the identified problems through the implementation of a computerized correction system.

  • Concise Explanation: The Board proposes to adopt a computerized correction system to enhance efficiency and integrity in examination scoring.
  • Key Definitions:
    • "Computerized correction system": A fully automated process designed to correct examination papers quickly and accurately.
  • Important Requirements/Procedures:
    • Collaboration with the Technology Livelihood Research Center (TLRC) for the design and demonstration of the computerized system.
  • Relevant Timeframes:
    • The computerized correction system is projected to complete the correction of 2500 examinees in approximately three days.
  • Consequences: Aims to minimize anomalies and shorten the waiting period for examination results.

Resolution and Approval Request

This section outlines the formal adoption of the proposal and the request for approval from the PRC.

  • Concise Explanation: The resolution requests the PRC to approve the implementation of the computerized correction system starting with the August 1990 examination.
  • Key Definitions:
    • "Resolution": A formal decision or expression of opinion made by the Board.
  • Important Requirements/Procedures:
    • Upon PRC approval, the computerized system will be utilized for the upcoming examination.
  • Relevant Timeframes: The resolution is effective immediately upon PRC approval for the August 1990 examination.
  • Consequences: Enhanced integrity and efficiency in the examination process.

Adoption and Signatories

This section lists the members who adopted the resolution and confirms the formalization of the proposal.

  • Concise Explanation: The resolution is adopted by the members of the Board of Medicine, indicating collective agreement and support.
  • Key Definitions:
    • "Members": Individuals who comprise the Board of Medicine and are responsible for the resolution.
  • Important Requirements/Procedures:
    • Signatures of the Board members signify official adoption of the resolution.
  • Relevant Timeframes: The adoption date is noted as August 9, 1990.
  • Consequences: The resolution is officially recognized and initiates the process for computerized correction.

Key Takeaways

  • The Board of Medicine identifies inefficiencies and risks in the current manual correction system of medical board examinations.
  • A proposal for a computerized correction system aims to enhance accuracy, reduce processing time, and preserve the integrity of the examination results.
  • The resolution requests PRC approval for immediate implementation, starting with the August 1990 examination, with the backing of all Board members.

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research tool in the Philippines with case digests and full jurisprudence. AI summaries highlight key points but might skip important details or context. Always check the full text for accuracy.