Coterminous Appointments Extension Order

Ask AI

MEMORANDUM ORDER NO. 01: Coterminous Appointments Extension Order

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the law?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Coterminous Appointments Extension Order

Law: Memorandum Order No. 01

Decision Date: Jun 30, 2016

A memorandum order grants Secretary Carlito Guansing Galvez, Jr. the authority to continue in office on a hold-over capacity, ensuring the uninterrupted functioning of the Office of the Presidential Adviser on Peace, Reconciliation and Unity and the implementation of the comprehensive peace process in the Philippines.

presidential adviser

peace reconciliation

A

Exclusions from the Extension

The extension does not apply to employees and officials in the following categories:
- Private Office personnel, except for employees of the Internal House Affairs Office and the Protocol Office who are included in the extension.
- Immediate staff of the Office of the Executive Secretary.
- Staff of the Office of the Cabinet Secretary.
- Employees in various Offices of Presidential Advisers and Presidential Assistants.

Effectivity and Implementation

The Memorandum Order took effect immediately upon issuance, dated June 30, 2016.
It was issued by the Executive Secretary by authority of the President.

Purpose and Legal Implications

The temporary extension is a measure to prevent disruption in government services during transitions or exigent circumstances.
It provides a clear directive for holdover employment status for specified officials and employees.
The order ensures continuity without prejudice to the authority of appointing powers to revoke or reappoint as necessary prior to the extension expiration date.

END