Title
Supreme Court
Regulation of Hazing in Organizations
Law
Republic Act No. 8049
Decision Date
Jun 7, 1995
The Anti-Hazing Law in the Philippines aims to prevent hazing activities by defining hazing, setting requirements for initiation rites, and imposing penalties for those found guilty.

Law Summary

Notice Requirement for Initiation Rites

  • No hazing or initiation rites are permitted without prior written notice to school authorities or the head of the organization.
  • Notice must be given seven (7) days before the initiation.
  • The notice must state the duration of initiation (not exceeding three days).
  • It must include the names of individuals subjected to initiation.
  • It must contain an undertaking that no physical violence will be used.

Supervision During Initiation

  • The head of the school or organization must assign at least two (2) representatives to monitor the initiation rites.
  • These representatives are tasked with ensuring no physical harm is inflicted on the subjects.

Liability and Penalties for Hazing Resulting in Injury or Death

  • All officers and members who participate in hazing causing injury or death are liable as principals.
  • Penalties vary according to the severity of injury or consequence:
    • Death, rape, sodomy, mutilation: Reclusion perpetua
    • Insanity, imbecility, impotence, blindness: Maximum period of reclusion temporal
    • Loss of speech, hearing, smell, eye, hand, foot, arm, or leg: Medium period of reclusion temporal
    • Deformity or loss of other body parts, or incapacitation over 90 days: Minimum period of reclusion temporal
    • Incapacitation over 30 days: Maximum period of prision mayor
    • Incapacitation over 10 days or medical attendance needed for 10 days: Medium period of prision mayor
    • Incapacitation from 1 to 9 days or medical attendance same period: Minimum period of prision mayor
    • Physical injury without preventing habitual activity or medical attendance: Maximum period of prision correccional
  • Administrative sanctions may also be imposed by educational or police/military authorities even before conviction.

Circumstances for Imposition of Maximum Penalty

  • Use of force, violence, threat, intimidation, or deceit against a recruit refusing to join.
  • Preventing withdrawal of consent after learning of hazing.
  • Obstruction from reporting hazing by force or intimidation.
  • Hazing conducted outside the school or institution.
  • Victims below twelve (12) years of age.

Liability of Third Parties

  • Owners of premises where hazing occurs with actual knowledge but no preventive action are liable as accomplices.
  • Parents with actual knowledge of hazing in their home who fail to act are liable as principals.
  • School authorities and faculty members with actual knowledge who fail to prevent hazing are liable as accomplices.

Liability of Organizers and Advisors

  • Officers, former officers, alumni who planned hazing but were not physically present are principals.
  • Members who induce victims to be present during hazing are principals.
  • Advisers present who fail to prevent hazing are principals.
  • Presence at hazing is prima facie evidence of participation, unless actively preventing the act.

No Mitigating Circumstance for Intent

  • Those charged cannot claim lack of intent to commit grave harm as a mitigating factor.
  • The law applies also to corporate officers if hazing is a requirement for employment.

Severability Clause

  • If any provision is declared invalid or unconstitutional, other provisions remain effective.

Repealing Clause

  • Laws, orders, rules, or regulations inconsistent with this Act are amended or repealed.

Effectivity Clause

  • The Act takes effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in at least two (2) national newspapers of general circulation.

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.