Circumstances Necessitating Amendment
- Highly urbanized areas have significant permanent residential and commercial structures on both sides of roads.
- Property owners resisted selling land for road widening due to sentimental value and lack of alternative relocation sites.
- Acquisition costs and social impact of enforcing a 20-meter minimum width were considerable.
Technical Justification for Reduced Road Width
- Engineers concluded that a 15-meter width could be sufficient in urban areas with appropriate road design.
- Design adaptations include closed drainage, curbs, and gutters to maintain functionality and safety.
- This alternative was more cost-effective than expropriating expensive urban land and demolishing existing structures.
Legal Amendment Provisions
- Executive Order No. 113, Section on General Provisions, was amended.
- National roads must have a right of way of not less than 20 meters generally.
- The Minister of Public Highways may reduce this minimum width to 15 meters within highly urbanized areas at their discretion.
- Rights of way of at least 60 meters are mandated for roads through unpatented public lands.
- Rights of way of at least 120 meters are required for roads through naturally forested areas of aesthetic or scientific value.
Effective Date and Authority
- The amendment took immediate effect upon issuance.
- The order was signed by the President and the Presidential Assistant on September 18, 1980, in Manila.
Overall Legal and Social Impact
- The amendment balances infrastructure needs with social considerations in dense urban settings.
- It establishes flexible standards to minimize displacement of residents while ensuring road functionality.
- Emphasizes a practical approach to road classification and right-of-way widths tailored to geographical and social realities.