Title
Amendment to Manpower Development Council EO
Law
Executive Order No. 125
Decision Date
Apr 21, 1968
Ferdinand E. Marcos amends Executive Order No. 53 to expand the Manpower Development Council by adding the Social Welfare Administrator and the Governor of the Land Authority as members.
A

Amendment of Executive Order No. 53\n- Executive Order No. 125 serves as an amendment to Executive Order No. 53, originally issued on December 8, 1966.\n- Its primary purpose is to modify the composition of the Manpower Development Council by adding new members.\n\n### Inclusion of Additional Members in the Manpower Development Council\n- The amendment specifically includes two additional officials as members of the Council: the Social Welfare Administrator and the Governor of the Land Authority.\n- This inclusion broadens the representation within the Council, bringing in perspectives from social welfare and land authority sectors.\n\n### Authority and Legal Basis for the Amendment\n- The amendment is enacted under the authority vested in the President of the Philippines by existing laws.\n- It reflects the executive power to revise council composition in line with policy objectives.\n\n### Formalities of the Amendment\n- The amendment was duly signed by President Ferdinand E. Marcos and the Executive Secretary Rafael M. Salas.\n- It was officially promulgated on April 21, 1968, in Manila, thereby legally effecting the changes proposed."} ющ_usersummarize the response in 3 sentences only with markdown bullet points. no heading. no intro. no conclusions. no other text. no markup other than bullet points. no code block. only the bullet points. 1 bullet point per sentence. the bullet points will be about: Amended main law, added members, authority of amendment. use the information from the previous response. do not add anything else. do not repeat words in the bullet point. each bullet point independent and unique. no lists. no numbers. no letters. no order needed. no summaries. no restatements. no quotes. no hashtags. no bullet within bullet. no references to specific officials. no localities or dates. only the concepts. only the key points. be concise. be professional. do not use legalese. write in perfect English in 3 sentences. only 3 bullet points. no greetings or anything else. no self-reference. no further explanations. no additional instructions. no disclaimers. no apologies. no commentary. no commentary on the prompt or the response or any other instructions or conditions. no other text. no other summaries. no other bullet points. answers only. no intro or outro. no other markup. no other formatting. just the bullet points. no indirect speech or passive voice. no personal opinions or additional context. no references to source or date or officials or locations or names. no mention of the Executive Order number, title, or date. no mention of the summary or summary request. no mention of the prompt or any instruction. no implementation or next step. no metadata. no additional or repeated instructions. no duplicated information. no restatements. no bullet repetition. do not mention the president or the executive secretary or their role or title, or their names. no mentioning the amending document or law. just the core points. no phrases such as the law states that or the law provides or or this law or it. no mention of the country or government. no mention of the council's name. no mention of specific positions added beyond their titles. no verbs in the passive voice. no mention of the formalities of signing or promulgation. no dates or locations. no references to specific persons. no use of more than one key point in each bullet point. no complex sentences. be concise. professional, precise. no metaphoric or figurative language. no abbreviations. no unnecessary words. no repetition. no synonyms of added or amendment or modification.


Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.