Title
Resetting of Franchise Case Hearings
Law
Ltfrb Memorandum Circular No. 95-001
Decision Date
Jan 25, 1995
Uncontested applications for public land transport franchises on newly-opened routes, previously suspended due to a Supreme Court Temporary Restraining Order, will now be rescheduled for hearing without the need for re-filing, as directed by the LTFRB.
A

Q&A (LTFRB MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 95-001)

The routes mentioned are newly-opened or developmental routes as declared by the Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC).

No, applicants do not need to re-file their applications as the cases will be rescheduled for hearing chronologically.

The hearings were suspended because of the Temporary Restraining Order issued by the Supreme Court on June 20, 1994.

The signatories are Dante M. Lantin (Chairman), Nabor C. Gaviola (Board Member), and Jesus C. Cruz (Board Member) of the LTFRB.

It applies only to applications for franchises to operate public land transport services on newly-opened or developmental routes declared by the DOTC and which are uncontested.

It means the cases will be heard in the order they were originally filed or based on their priority in the Board's calendar without the need for re-filing.

The LTFRB exercises its regulatory authority over public land transportation franchises to reschedule hearings as per their administrative procedures.

It signifies that the memorandum serves as official notice and directive to all stakeholders involved, including applicants and regulatory bodies, ensuring they are informed and comply accordingly.


Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.