Question & AnswerQ&A (LTFRB MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 2002-009, JUNE 7, 2002)
The purpose was to mandate that all applicants/petitioners with hearings before the LTFRB must be represented by members of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) in good standing, to prevent the submission of spurious documents and ensure proper processing of applications/petitions.
All applications/petitions with hearings had to be signed by a lawyer (IBP member in good standing) who reviews all attached documents and represents the client during hearings. Only two authorized representatives per lawyer could transact with the Board.
It gave applicants/petitioners the freedom to choose whether to avail of legal representation before the Board, making it no longer compulsory to be represented by a lawyer.
The Board received complaints from parties who felt their freedom to choose legal representation was circumscribed, and noted that previously, applicants could pursue applications without lawyers without adverse effects.
It took effect fifteen (15) days after filing three copies with the UP Law Center, pursuant to Presidential Memorandum Circular No. 11 dated October 9, 1992.
Lawyers must be members of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines in good standing to represent applicants before the LTFRB.
Non-lawyers are not allowed to represent applicants/petitioners personally. However, authorized representatives of lawyers can file pleadings on behalf of the lawyer, limited to two per lawyer.
The names of the duly authorized representatives must be submitted to the Board for its information and proper guidance.
No, only paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 of MC No. 2001-018 were modified to allow applicants the option of legal representation. Other inconsistent previous issuances or parts were repealed or modified accordingly.
The Board aimed to accord applicants/petitioners freedom of choice consistent with democratic processes while still maintaining order in the application process.