Extends Anti-Graft Offense Prescription

Republic Act No. 10910
Republic Act No. 10910 extends the prescriptive period for violations of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act from fifteen to twenty years, enhancing accountability for corruption in public service.

Questions (Republic Act No. 10910)

RA 10910 is a law that increases the prescriptive period for violations of RA 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act) from fifteen (15) years to twenty (20) years, by amending Section 11 of RA 3019.

RA 10910 amended Section 11 (Prescription of Offenses) of RA 3019, revising the prescriptive period to twenty (20) years for offenses punishable under the Act.

The prescriptive period is twenty (20) years.

It contains a separability clause stating that if any provision is declared invalid, the remaining provisions continue to be valid and subsisting.

It provides that all laws, executive orders, administrative orders, rules, and regulations, or parts thereof, inconsistent with RA 10910 are amended, repealed, or modified accordingly.

RA 10910 takes effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in at least two (2) newspapers of general circulation.

It refers to Article VI, Section 27(1) of the 1987 Philippine Constitution.

It indicates the bill became law automatically under the Constitution after the required period lapsed without presidential action, consistent with Article VI, Section 27(1).

They determine the time limit within which the State may file or proceed with criminal prosecution; once prescription sets in, the offender can no longer be prosecuted, subject to rules on computation and interruption.

Whether the extension of the prescriptive period under RA 10910 can apply to acts committed prior to its effectivity, considering principles on retroactivity, favorability to the accused, and constitutional limits on ex post facto laws.

Whether the extended prescriptive period under RA 10910 applies, and thus whether the case is still timely (not yet prescribed) as of the filing date.

The separability clause preserves the rest of the law if part is invalid; the repealing clause removes or modifies inconsistent existing laws or regulations.

The implied policy is to provide more time to prosecute anti-graft and corruption cases by lengthening the prescriptive period from 15 to 20 years.

By using these details to track the bill’s passage and to confirm the correct version and dates of approval, adoption, and related official references for legal research and citation.

It sets a general rule: “All offenses punishable under this Act shall prescribe in twenty years,” without creating separate periods for specific offenses within the text provided.


Philippine legal research, made clearer
AI-generated research aids. Verify with Full Text.