Title
PNP and CIDG subpoena powers amended
Law
Republic Act No. 10973
Decision Date
Mar 1, 2018
Republic Act No. 10973 grants the Chief of the Philippine National Police and the Director and Deputy Director for Administration of the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group the power to administer oath and issue subpoenas, with failure to comply resulting in potential contempt charges.

Questions (Republic Act No. 10973)

The law is Republic Act No. 10973. Its purpose is to grant the Chief of the PNP and the Director and Deputy Director for Administration of the CIDG authority to administer oaths and to issue subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum in relation to their investigations.

RA 10973 inserted a new Section 26-A into Republic Act No. 6975.

No. The powers must be exercised solely by the specified officials and may not be further delegated to any other person or office.

The subpoena must state the nature and purpose of the investigation and be directed to the person whose attendance is required.

In addition to stating the nature and purpose and directing attendance, it must contain a reasonable description of the books, documents, or things demanded, which must be relevant to the investigation.

Non-compliance authorizes the filing of a case for indirect contempt under the Rules of Court with the Regional Trial Court.

The Regional Trial Court.

It specifically grants the PNP Chief and certain CIDG officials express subpoena and oath-administering authority, whereas RA 6975 did not provide the same explicit authority for these particular functions as amended by RA 10973.

To limit the demand under a subpoena duces tecum to items that are reasonably connected to the investigation, thereby preventing overly broad or arbitrary fishing expeditions.

The law takes effect fifteen (15) days after its complete publication in the Official Gazette or in at least two (2) newspapers of general circulation.

If any provision of the Act is declared invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining provisions not otherwise affected remain in force.

It states that any law, decree, ordinance, or administrative circular inconsistent with any provision of RA 10973 is amended, repealed, or modified accordingly.

It provides that failure to comply authorizes filing of a case for indirect contempt under the Rules of Court, indicating the enforcement procedure follows the framework for contempt under those rules.


Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.