Title
Deportation Complaints: Certification Against Forum-Shopping
Law
Bi Memorandum Order No. Add-03-009
Decision Date
Jun 2, 2003
To combat forum shopping in deportation cases, all complainants must certify under oath that they have not filed similar claims elsewhere, with strict penalties for non-compliance or false declarations.
A

Q&A (BI MEMORANDUM ORDER NO. ADD-03-009)

The plaintiff must certify under oath that they have not commenced any other action involving the same issues in any court, tribunal, or quasi-judicial agency and to the best of their knowledge, no such action or claim is pending.

The plaintiff must report this fact within five (5) days to the court where the original complaint or pleading was filed.

Failure to comply is cause for dismissal of the case without prejudice upon motion and after hearing, and such failure is not curable by mere amendment of the complaint.

Submission of a false certification or non-compliance constitutes indirect contempt of court and may also result in administrative and criminal actions.

If the acts of the party or counsel show willful and deliberate forum-shopping, it can lead to summary dismissal with prejudice and constitute direct contempt and grounds for administrative sanctions.

No, the Bureau can still take appropriate action if violations of immigration law are clear, despite the certification requirements.

Forum-shopping refers to the practice of filing multiple suits based on the same cause of action in different courts or tribunals to obtain a favorable judgment.

The Memorandum took effect immediately upon its issuance on June 2, 2003.


Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.