G.R. No. 187854 - Vivo vs. Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp.

Vivo vs. Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp.

Getting related questions...
Conversations stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. Know more about your privacy jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Vivo vs. Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corp.

Case: G.R. No. 187854

Decision Date: Nov 12, 2013

PAGCOR employee dismissed for misconduct; claimed due process violation. SC upheld CA, ruling procedural due process observed, right to counsel not required, defects cured by appeal.

dismissed employee

administrative proceeding

requirements of due process

Standard 13 min

END