Title
Camacho vs. Coresis, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 134372
Decision Date
Aug 22, 2002
A university dean alleged improper grading by a professor for faculty students; Ombudsman dismissed claims, upheld by Supreme Court, citing academic freedom and lack of abuse of discretion.
Font Size:

Timeline (G.R. No. 134372)

  1. Petitioner’s Position: Manuel Camacho is the Dean of the College of Education at the University of Southeastern Philippines (USP) since January 1994.

  2. Respondent’s Role: Dr. Sixto O. Daleon is a Professor and Officer-in-Charge of the Graduate School at USP, with a salary grade of CS 29.

  3. Course Enrollment: Aida Agulo, Desiderio Alaba, and Norma Tecson, faculty members, enrolled in Dr. Daleon's Ed.D. 317 course during the first semester of 1994-1995.

  4. Grading Controversy: Dr. Daleon awarded passing grades (1.0, 1.25, and 1.5) to Agulo, Alaba, and Tecson without requiring them to attend regular classes.

  5. Complaints Raised: In June 1995, several doctoral students complained to Camacho about "ghost students" receiving passing grades despite non-attendance.

  6. Initial Inquiry: On June 13, 1995, Camacho requested Dr. Daleon to provide photocopies of exams, term papers, and attendance records, which Dr. Daleon ignored.

  7. University Council Meeting: On July 28, 1995, the issue was discussed in a university council meeting, leading to the creation of an investigative committee by the University President, Dr. Edmundo Prantilla.

  8. Dr. Daleon’s Admission: In a letter dated August 10, 1995, Dr. Daleon admitted to making special arrangements with the students without Camacho's approval.

  9. Recommendations Made: Camacho recommended that Agulo, Alaba, and Tecson be required to attend regular classes for the 1995-1996 school year, which Dr. P...continue reading


Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.