Case Summary (G.R. No. 82067)
Procedural History and Initial Conviction
The Sandiganbayan initially convicted Zambrano on August 28, 1986. Following this, she filed a motion for a new trial, which was granted. Upon her retrial, she entered a plea of not guilty. The prosecution’s primary witness, Carlito Capinpin, conducted an audit identifying various financial discrepancies amounting to the alleged malversed funds. A demand letter was sent to Zambrano in July 1980, requesting restitution for the identified shortage, but she did not comply.
Audit Examination and Evidence Presentation
Capinpin's audit revealed that Zambrano's financial records demonstrated significant cash shortages across various categories, amounting to P1,207,835.19. He testified about the methodology employed during the audit, noting that supporting documents were available for scrutiny. Conversely, Zambrano's defense witness, Cesario Mateo, challenged the prosecution's claims, asserting that many cash advances lacked appropriate documentation. However, he could not effectively explain why the entries appeared under Zambrano’s records.
Defense Testimony and Claims
In her defense, Zambrano argued that she had held multiple positions within the authority without previous issues and that a misunderstanding had led to the charges against her. She mentioned cash advances made at the behest of her superiors, which she contended corresponded to necessary government expenditures, albeit lacking formal documentation. Despite admitting to certain procedural oversights, she maintained that the failure to account for the funds was not solely her responsibility.
Sandiganbayan's Ruling
On January 8, 1988, the Sandiganbayan found Zambrano guilty of malversation of public funds. The court highlighted the established fact that Zambrano had received the funds but failed to return them upon demand. The court underscored that accountability was not negated merely because direct evidence of personal misuse of funds was absent, emphasizing legal precedents that support convictions based on the failure to account satisfactorily for missing public funds.
Final Findings and Conclusion
The Supreme Court, upon review, determined that the evidence against Zambrano was compelling, affirming the Sandiganbayan's conclusions regarding her negligence in handling public funds. The princip
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 82067)
Case Background
- This case involves a petition for review on certiorari concerning the conviction of Lucilyn T. Zambrano for malversation of public funds, decided by the Sandiganbayan on January 8, 1988, in Criminal Case No. 2559.
- Zambrano was employed as Cashier I and Special Disbursing Officer at the National Grains Authority (now National Food Authority) in Cotabato City during the period from January 20, 1976, to January 24, 1980.
- She was accused of misappropriating a total of P1,207,835.19, which was deemed to have been converted for her personal use.
Charges and Initial Proceedings
- The charge against Zambrano was based on her alleged failure to account for public funds collected and received due to her position.
- The Sandiganbayan initially convicted her on August 28, 1986, but she filed a motion for a new trial which was granted on October 13, 1986.
- Upon her arraignment, Zambrano pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Prosecution's Case
- The prosecution's key witness was Carlito Capinpin, an auditor for the Commission on Audit (COA), who conducted an audit of Zambrano's accounts.
- Capinpin's audit revealed several discrepancies:
- Cash advances under the Cereal Procurement Fund totaled P10,543,165.56, with cash disbursements of P10,115,620.49, resulting in a shortage of P427,545.07.
- Operational funds showed a sh