Title
Yusuke Fukuzume vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 143647
Decision Date
Nov 11, 2005
Yusuke Fukuzume misrepresented himself, defrauding Javier Ng Yu of P290,000 for nonexistent aluminum scrap wires. RTC Makati lacked jurisdiction; SC dismissed case, allowing refiling in proper venue.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-10525)

Procedural Background

This matter arises from a petition for review on certiorari challenging the March 13, 2000 Decision of the Court of Appeals (CA) which affirmed the October 21, 1996 ruling of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Makati finding Fukuzume guilty of estafa. The CA modified the penalty while the RTC originally sentenced Fukuzume to twenty years imprisonment and ordered him to pay Yu the sum of P424,000.00.

Factual Background

In July 1991, Yu was introduced to Fukuzume by Mr. Jovate, who informed Yu that Fukuzume had aluminum scrap wires available for sale. After receiving assurances from Fukuzume that these wires belonged to Furukawa and were stored with the National Power Corporation (NAPOCOR), Yu agreed to purchase them for P200,000.00. Over several transactions, he paid a total of P290,000.00 to Fukuzume, who later presented Yu with certifications allegedly issued by NAPOCOR to substantiate his claims about the aluminum wires.

Key Transactions and Issues

Yu experienced multiple issues during the transaction process, including bounced checks from Fukuzume and refusals by NAPOCOR to honor purported authorizations from Fukuzume, citing that the signing official was no longer employed there. After failing to retrieve the aluminum wires and requests for repayment being ignored, Yu eventually lodged a complaint with the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), leading to Fukuzume’s indictment for estafa on November 4, 1994.

Trial Court Findings

During the trial, the RTC found Fukuzume guilty of estafa based on Article 315, paragraph 2(a) of the Revised Penal Code, which defines estafa as utilizing false pretenses to induce someone to part with property to the detriment of that person. The RTC's decision comprehensively outlined that the elements of false pretense, reliance by the victim, and resultant damage were satisfied.

Court of Appeals Ruling

The CA upheld the RTC's finding of guilt but modified the sentence, recognizing that the minimum penalty for the crime was incorrectly applied by the RTC. It adjusted the penalty to a range from six years and one day of reclusion temporal to a maximum of twenty years of imprisonment while affirming the award for civil liability.

Jurisdictional Issues

Fukuzume raised multiple grounds for appeal, particularly contesting the RTC's jurisdiction over the offense. Central to this issue was whether or not any critical elements of the crime, such as meaningful transactions, occurred within the jurisdiction of Makati. The CA had ruled jurisdiction based on the venue where the initial payment was reportedly made but did not adequately reflect the testimonies and evidence suggesting that the transactions predominantly occurred in Parañaque.

Critical Legal Analysis

Upon review, it emerged that venue is essential for jurisdiction in cr

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.