Title
Yulo vs. Yang Chiao Seng
Case
G.R. No. L-12541
Decision Date
Aug 28, 1959
A dispute arose over whether a 1945 agreement between Yang Chiao Seng and Rosario U. Yulo constituted a partnership or a sublease. The Supreme Court ruled it was a sublease, as Yulo did not contribute capital, share losses, or participate in management, and her monthly payments were for premises use, not profits. The agreement terminated upon lease cancellation in 1949.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-12541)

Lease Agreement and Termination with Landowners

Mrs. Yulo had leased the land from the Santa Marinas on an indefinite-term basis, cancellable after one year upon 90 days’ written notice. The last lease was signed April 5, 1948. On April 12, 1949 the lessors notified her that the lease would terminate July 31, 1949.

Procedural History of Ejectment and Related Suits

In response, Mrs. Yulo and her husband filed suit on July 3, 1949 to declare the lease indefinite. On August 17, 1949 the landowners sued for ejectment in the Municipal Court of Manila. That court ordered their ejectment on Feb. 9, 1950; the decision was appealed. The two actions were consolidated in the Court of First Instance, which, on appeal from the Municipal Court, dismissed the Yulos’ complaint, declared the lease terminated July 31, 1949, and fixed reasonable rental at P100 monthly. The Court of Appeals affirmed on April 30, 1955.

Initiation of Suit against Yang Chiao Seng

On Oct. 27, 1950 Mrs. Yulo demanded her profit share. Yang replied that he had suspended payments because the ejectment suit left him liable to landowners for unpaid rent, which he retained from her P3,000 payments. On May 26, 1954 Mrs. Yulo sued Yang, alleging a partnership and claiming: (a) P35,000 for profit participation (Nov. 1949–Oct. 1950); (b) P5,000 monthly rent from Jan. 1951; (c) damages of P160,000 and exemplary P5,000; and (d) attorney’s fees of P10,000.

Defendant’s Answer and Counterclaim

Yang denied a partnership existed, asserting the arrangement was a sublease contrived to evade the prohibition against subleasing in Mrs. Yulo’s lease. He contended fair rental was only P1,100. By counterclaim he sought P100,000 damages for losses arising from an attachment of his property.

Trial Court Proceedings and Initial Decision

At the April 19, 1955 hearing, Yang did not appear; the trial court admitted Mrs. Yulo’s evidence in default and ordered Yang to pay P41,000 for profit participation through Dec. 1950, P5,000 monthly rent from Jan. 1951, and P300 for lobby occupation. On Mrs. Yulo’s motion, the court set aside that default judgment, finding the parties had agreed to a joint postponement for possible settlement, and granted a new trial.

Final Trial Court Findings and Judgment

After full trial, the court concluded no partnership existed because Mrs. Yulo never contributed capital or managed the business, and her fixed P3,000 guarantee resembled rent, not profit-sharing. The court deemed the agreement a sublease, held the lobby too narrow for business under Manila ordinances, and dismissed Mrs. Yulo’s complaint. It also dismissed Yang

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.