Title
YHT Realty Corp. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 126780
Decision Date
Feb 17, 2005
A hotel guest lost money from his safety deposit box due to unauthorized access by an acquaintance, facilitated by hotel employees. The Supreme Court ruled the hotel liable, voiding its liability waiver under Article 2003 of the Civil Code, and upheld damages for gross negligence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 126780)

Parties

Petitioners: YHT Realty Corporation, Erlinda Lainez, Anicia Payam
Respondents: Maurice McLoughlin and the Court of Appeals (in its capacity as appellee in the petition for certiorari)

Key Dates

• December 1984–September 1987: McLoughlin’s initial stays at Tropicana
• October 30, 1987: McLoughlin rents a safety deposit box
• December 12, 1987: First withdrawal; discovers shortage later in Hong Kong
• April 4–16, 1988: Second box rental; discovers further shortages on April 16
• December 3, 1990: Complaint for damages filed before the Regional Trial Court (RTC)
• December 16, 1991: RTC renders judgment in favor of McLoughlin
• October 19, 1995: Court of Appeals affirms RTC but modifies damages
• February 17, 2005: Supreme Court issues its decision

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution – confers appellate jurisdiction on the Supreme Court under Article VIII, Section 5(2) to resolve questions of law raised by a petition for certiorari (Rule 45).
• New Civil Code of the Philippines:
– Article 1170 (liability for negligence)
– Articles 1998–2001 (innkeeper’s responsibility for guests’ effects)
– Article 2003 (prohibition of waiver of innkeeper’s liability)
– Article 2180(4) (employer’s liability for employees)
– Article 2193 (solidary liability for quasi-delicts)

Factual Background

McLoughlin, having transferred from Sheraton to Tropicana at the recommendation of Tan, routinely rented a safety deposit box secured by two keys: one with the guest, one with Tropicana management. On December 12, 1987, and again on April 16, 1988, he discovered significant shortages of U.S. and Australian dollars and jewelry from his box. Upon inquiry, Lainez and Payam admitted they had assisted Tan in opening the box with the master key on multiple occasions. Tan later confessed to stealing McLoughlin’s key and, with Lopez’s assistance, using it to open his box. Lopez drafted a promissory note on Tan’s behalf for partial reimbursement, but the hotel management declined liability, invoking a pre-printed “Undertaking for the Use of Safety Deposit Box” signed by McLoughlin, which purported to release Tropicana from any loss.

Procedural History

McLoughlin pursued administrative remedies through the Office of the President, Department of Justice, and police authorities without success. He then filed a complaint for damages in December 1990 against YHT Realty Corporation, Lopez, Lainez, Payam, and Tan. Tan and Lopez were never served; trial proceeded against YHT, Lainez, and Payam only. The RTC found petitioners jointly and solidarily liable for actual, moral, exemplary, and litigation damages. The Court of Appeals affirmed liability but reduced the amounts awarded under several heads. YHT, Lainez, and Payam then filed a Rule 45 petition before the Supreme Court, raising four principal issues concerning factual findings, negligence, the validity of the waiver, and the quantum of damages.

Issues Presented

  1. Whether the uncorroborated testimony of McLoughlin sufficed to prove the prior existence and subsequent loss of the deposited money and jewelry.
  2. Whether petitioners were grossly negligent as innkeepers.
  3. Whether the “Undertaking for the Use of Safety Deposit Box” is void under Article 2003 of the Civil Code.
  4. Whether the damages awarded were proper in form and amount.

Supreme Court Decision

  1. Credibility and Proof of Loss
    – The Supreme Court deferred to the RTC’s firsthand appraisal of McLoughlin’s testimony, noting that courts give great weight to trial judges’ evaluations of witness credibility. The finding of factual loss was, therefore, beyond the scope of Rule 45 review.

  2. Gross Negligence of Innkeeper
    – Tropicana required two keys to open a box; management employees alone could supply the second key. By admitting that Lainez and Payam repeatedly assisted Tan (a non-guest) in accessing McLoughlin’s box while he slept, petitioners were at minimum grossly negligent. Under Articles 1170 and 2180(4), YHT Realty Corporation, as employer, is vicariously liable for its employees’ negligence. Solidary liability under Article 2193 applied.

  3. Invalidity of the Waiver
    – Article 2003 of the Civil Code ex

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.