Title
Supreme Court
Western Mindanao Power Corp. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Case
G.R. No. 181136
Decision Date
Jun 13, 2012
WMPC sought VAT refund for zero-rated sales to NPC but was denied due to missing "zero-rated" imprint on receipts, violating RR 7-95 invoicing requirements. SC upheld CTA's ruling, emphasizing strict compliance for tax refund claims.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 181136)

Summary of Proceedings

WMPC, a domestically registered corporation engaged in electricity production, applied for a tax refund of unutilized input Value Added Tax (VAT), asserting that its sales to the National Power Corporation (NPC) were zero-rated under the applicable tax laws. The CIR denied the claim, citing WMPC's failure to comply with invoicing requirements, particularly the absence of the term "zero-rated" on its official receipts as mandated by Revenue Regulations No. 7-95.

Basis of the Claim

WMPC filed for a refund of input VAT covering two separate sums applicable to the third and fourth quarters of 1999, and all quarters of 2000, totaling P9,324,283.30. The basis for claiming zero-rated status stemmed from NPC's tax-exempt status under Section 13 of R.A. No. 6395 and provisions in the NIRC acknowledging the tax treatment of services rendered to entities exempt from taxation.

Challenges to the Claim

The CIR challenged the validity of WMPC's claim by focusing on the procedural inadequacies of WMPC's invoices, which did not meet requirements specified in Section 4.108-1 of RR 7-95, along with the assertion that WMPC did not adequately substantiate claims for zero-rated sales in their VAT Returns where the relevant fields were left blank.

Court of Tax Appeals Decisions

Initially, the CTA Second Division ruled against WMPC, concluding that the absence of the term "zero-rated" on the invoices warranted denial of the refund request, despite WMPC's arguments that such requirements were merely administrative and did not invalidate the nature of their sales. The CTA En Banc upheld the Second Division's conclusion in its subsequent ruling on the appellate review.

Rationale for the Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's decision, emphasizing the importance of strict compliance with legal provisions regarding tax exemptions and refunds. The Court reiterated that tax laws should be strictly interpreted against the claimant, and thus WMPC's failure to meet the invoicing requirements was fatal to its case. Additionally, the ruling maintained that the absence of the term

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.