Case Summary (A.C. No. 10254)
Respondent's Representation in Ejectment Case
The complainant, a member of the Neighborhood Association, was involved in an ejectment case against Estate of Francisco De Borja represented by Elisea S. De Borja, with Atty. Aranjuez acting as counsel. The Association lost the case at both the Municipal Trial Court and the Regional Trial Court, prompting Atty. Aranjuez to file a petition for review with the Court of Appeals.
Allegations of Negligence
Violago alleged that she was not informed about the status of the petition for review, which was dismissed by the Court of Appeals on July 25, 2013, due to several critical errors, such as failure to attach necessary pleadings and defects in the verification of non-forum shopping. She claimed that these oversights prompted her to consult various lawyers who characterized the respondent's mistakes as egregious, leading her to resign from the Neighborhood Association and request Atty. Aranjuez to withdraw as their counsel.
Respondent's Defense
Atty. Aranjuez argued that he offered his services pro bono due to the members' socioeconomic status. He contended that he maintained communication with the Neighborhood Association's officers and claimed to have met the complainant only once. The respondent denied negligence, asserting he had diligently represented the Association from trial through to the Supreme Court and had even filed an Omnibus Motion to rectify defects identified by the Court of Appeals.
Findings and Recommendations from the IBP
Commissioner Erwin L. Aguilera recommended a three-year suspension from practicing law for Aranjuez due to his failure to meet the basic standards in filing pleadings. The IBP adopted these findings but modified the penalty, suggesting instead a six-month suspension.
Court's Analysis and Conclusion
The Court determined whether Atty. Aranjuez should face administrative discipline for his alleged negligence. Although the dismissal of the petition did exhibit material defects, the Court stressed that not all negligence translates into gross or inexcusable conduct warranting suspension. It acknowledged that Atty. Aranjuez exerted efforts to rectify the i
...continue readingCase Syllabus (A.C. No. 10254)
Case Background
- The administrative case originated from a sworn Complaint-Letter filed by Adela Hernandez Violago against Atty. Bonifacio F. Aranjuez, Jr. on November 26, 2013.
- The complaint was lodged before the Supreme Court-Office of the Bar Confidant (OBC) alleging negligence in handling an ejectment suit involving the E. Quiogue Extension Neighborhood Association, of which the complainant was a member.
- The Supreme Court referred the case to the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) for investigation, report, and recommendation, resulting in CBD Case No. 15-4627.
Complainant's Version
- Adela Violago was involved as a defendant in an ejectment case filed by the Estate of Francisco De Borja against several individuals, including herself, represented by respondent Atty. Aranjuez.
- The Neighborhood Association had already lost in both the Municipal and Regional Trial Courts before the respondent filed a petition for review before the Court of Appeals.
- Complainant was unaware of the petition's status until inquiries revealed its dismissal on July 25, 2013, due to multiple defects including:
- Lack of necessary pleadings and record portions.
- Non-compliance with notarial practices for the Verification and Certification on Non-Forum Shopping.
- Errors in the petitioner's name and attorney's MCLE compliance details.
- Incorrectly stated service of the petition.
- Complainant sought advice from other lawyers who indicated that the respondent's mistakes were fundamental and hence the dismissal.
- Following the dismissal, she and another me