Title
Villegas vs. Astorga
Case
G.R. No. L-26537
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1982
Mayor Villegas sought to inspect Municipal Board records; Vice-Mayor Astorga refused, citing separation of powers. Court ruled for Mayor, but case dismissed as moot after both lost elections.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-26537)

Background of the Case

The case began on September 18, 1965, when Villegas filed a petition in the Court of First Instance of Manila, seeking a writ of mandamus and prohibition with a preliminary injunction against Astorga. The core issue revolved around Villegas’s attempt to inspect the records of the Municipal Board, which Astorga refused to allow without specifying the documents to be examined.

The Trial Court's Proceedings

The trial court, presided over by Judge Luis B. Reyes, determined that the matter presented merely legal questions, allowing the case to proceed without a full trial. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Villegas, granting him permission to inspect the records and prohibited Astorga and his representatives from interfering with this ministerial duty.

Relevant Facts of the Dispute

Villegas directed a police team to inspect all records of the Municipal Board on August 24, 1965. He communicated this request through a memorandum, instructing officials to cooperate with the inspection. Astorga, subsequent to receiving the memorandum, sought clarification about which specific documents were to be inspected. Despite multiple requests from Villegas for compliance and reiterations of his authority under the Revised Charter of Manila, Astorga continued to resist the inspection.

Legal Basis for Mayor's Authority

The trial court referenced Section 11(f) of the Revised Charter of Manila, affirming the Mayor's authority to examine and inspect the records of all city officers, agents, and employees without distinction between executive and legislative branches. This provision highlighted that such oversight was a necessary function of Villegas's role as Mayor, countering Astorga's assertion of departmental courtesy requirements prior to compliance.

Ruling on the Case's Mootness

Despite the court's ruling in favor of Villegas, subsequent circumstances rendered the case moot and academic. Both parties l

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.