Title
Supreme Court
Vil-Rey Planners and Builders vs. Lexber, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 189401
Decision Date
Jun 15, 2016
Vil-Rey breached a construction contract with Lexber, failing to complete work despite extensions. Stronghold's surety bond liability remained intact. Lexber awarded damages, reduced attorney’s fees, and partial reimbursement to Vil-Rey.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 189401)

Petitioner

Vil-Rey Planners and Builders and Stronghold Insurance Company, Inc.

Respondent

Lexber, Inc.

Key Dates

• First Construction Contract: April 17, 1996 (60-day completion)
• Mutual termination and Second Contract: July 1, 1996 (remaining works, 60 days)
• Work Order (Third Contract): December 23, 1996 (completion by January 15, 1997; extended to January 31, 1997, plus five-day grace)
• RTC Decision: December 12, 2005; partial reconsideration October 22, 2007
• CA Decision: April 16, 2009; Resolution denying reconsideration: September 1, 2009
• SC Decision: June 15, 2016

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution (sanctity of contracts, due process)
• Civil Code of the Philippines: Articles 1167 (reciprocal obligations), 1169 (default and interest), 1170 (liability for delay), 2201 (damages), 2066–2067 (surety’s rights), 2227 (liquidated damages)
• Rules of Court, Rule 45 (certiorari)

Facts

  1. Under the first contract, Vil-Rey undertook compacted backfill work for P5,100,000, receiving a P500,000 mobilization down-payment secured by a surety bond from Stronghold.
  2. Parties mutually terminated the first contract and executed a second contract for P2,988,700.20, 60-day completion.
  3. A third contract (Work Order No. CAB-96-09) covered the remaining works for P1,168,728.37: 50% down-payment secured by Stronghold bond (P584,364.19) and 50% upon completion.
  4. Lexber extended the third contract deadline from January 15 to January 31, 1997, plus five additional days, yet Vil-Rey failed to finish the works.
  5. Lexber paid another contractor P284,084.46 to complete the project and claimed under both surety bonds. Vil-Rey counterclaimed unpaid receivables; Stronghold disputed its obligations under the bonds.

RTC Ruling

• Held Vil-Rey and Stronghold jointly and severally liable for P2,988,700.20 plus 12% interest and attorney’s fees (P500,000).
• Upheld indemnity agreements, ordered Stronghold’s cross-claim against Vil-Rey.
• On partial reconsideration, reduced liability to P1,084,364.19 (true bond amounts) plus 12% interest and attorney’s fees of P200,000.

CA Ruling

• Modified liability to P284,084.46 with 6% interest from February 11, 1997 until finality and 12% thereafter; attorney’s fees reduced to P50,000.
• Found no liability under the first surety bond (mobilization down-payment) due to mutual termination waiving earlier claims.
• Confirmed breach of the third contract and liability under the second surety bond for the cost to complete the works.
• Denied Vil-Rey’s and Stronghold’s counterclaims; upheld Stronghold’s cross-claim.

Issues

  1. Vil-Rey’s liability for breach of the third contract
  2. Effect of time extension on Stronghold’s liability under the second surety bond
  3. Entitlement to attorney’s fees

I. Breach of Contract by Vil-Rey

• Reciprocal obligations required Lexber’s 50% balance payment upon project completion by January 15, 1997.
• Extensions did not alter Vil-Rey’s obligation; failure to finish justified damages under Civil Code Article 1167.
• Damages fixed at P284,084.46 (cost to complete), with 6% interest from February 17, 1997 until full satisfaction (Art. 1169).

II. Surety Liability Not Extinguished by Extension

• The second bond was a performance bond guaranteeing “obligations” and completion of works, not merely material or workmanship defects.
• Surety’s obligation did not become more onerous by a 15-day extension and five-day grace, which benefited Stronghold by promoting contract completion.
• Stronghold’s objection to extension was raised too late (on reconsideration), and issues not timely raised cannot be considered on appeal.
• Stronghold remains liable







...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.